She did apologize, but I wouldn’t call it graceful. She apologized for being “wrong” rather than being a snarky, condescending shithead.

You couldn’t be more wrong in your analysis. He wasn’t just “bringing feelings”, rather he made perfectly valid points that a story this extraordinary should require more evidence than a single semi-anonymous source. It was clear there wasn’t more evidence, because if there was it would have been included. Even if…