applegrabber
Applegrabber
applegrabber

OH MY GOD wowwwwww the annoying moron with anger issues who has made a hobby out of being extremely racist/sexist/homophobic/denying climate change said another stupid thing. I swear it’s like everyone forgets what a massive piece of absolute shit he is every two years and before being suddenly reminded why. Please

Very out dated way of thinking. Kia has IMO one of the better lineups in the auto industry. Folks were spending mid 50s for kia stinger GT2 (not enough folks, but they have a pretty loyal fanbase), and folks are spending over 60k on top trim Tellurides. The Ev6 is completely unique from a styling perspective and a lot

Is this whole-ass comment about a completely different car? It’s honestly hard to tell what you’re talking about here.

The bigger question is why it took Chrysler 88 years to re-use the Airflow name.

Ask to talk to nearly anyone that’s bought a telluride in the last 2 years. With markup and options, they’re over 60k in Colorado, but you’ll see one at every stoplight. 

Perhaps they are people who want an electric car with proper body panel gaps?

I learned on a 1997 Dodge Dakota in the Midwest. My mom took me out to some county roads to practice. I actually thought that was a great little pickup to learn on because the throws were so incredibly long, as was the clutch travel, that it was very easy to find the proper gear and ensure it was in gear. Also,

That’s a lot... but what reliable transportation costs now. Which feels like 75% of NPOND now.

My sister-in-law had one of these maybe ~10 years ago. It was a fantastic little SUV. At the time, hers was a rusty POS, but it was a good one. It felt open and airy inside with a surprising amount of space/utility for a smaller vehicle. More modern vehicles seem downright clausterphobic and tiny inside today by

It probably is the right price in the current stupid market, but it oughtn’t to be. reluctant NP.

It’snot a bad little truck but 8k just feels like to much. So nd for me with no other reason than 8k for meh doesn't work for me.   

Goddammit what is wrong with you people? No one is cross-shopping a ‘78 Ford LTD II with a “modern CUV/SUV/Van/Sedan/Pickup.” No one is picking this up for a daily driver. It’s a cool looking old American luxo-barge that’s gonna be used for weekend cruising.

They were new, so after years of round headlights people thought thy looked modern (I liked them on ‘75 and later Cadillacs, for example).

I am not sure what year the one from MiB was

They aren’t fast. A modern minivan could probably blow the doors off this.”

You can say that about most any car from decades ago, yet a significant chunk of the population still wants them, enough to drive the price of a old cars well over the practical comparison test that you are applying.

Buying a car from this era has nothing to do with safety or efficiency.  People looking to spend $15k on a daily driver are not cross shopping these against Accords. Now, if I had $15k to spend on a late 70' coupe this would definitely not be the one I’d be looking for.

I know this is just an opinion.... But personally I feel those late 70's era cars with the square sealed beams simply look sort of ugly. Its like all of a sudden the manufacture decided to stick them on. They look out of place. I don’t care if its a “ time capsule”. Its not an attractive car.

As F86Pilot pointed out, it’s to keep from having a car go under a taller vehicle.

Those tires and wheels are a choice. One that makes me doubt all of the other choices current owner has made (the ones regarding this vehicle being most significant).