Maybe people should try injecting foam or rubber into their heads. I'm sure it would help.

Chill, random person on the internet. For him/her it's still "next gen" if he/she only owns a 360 or ps3. After all, his/her current console generation is still the 7th.

Sorry, people. One word: Minecraft.

That's exactly my first point, thank you for making it even clearer. People really think it's better to play games far apart than on the same couch, yelling and making fun of each other in person. And "convenient" is a very relative and personal word. I think it's way more convenient to play together, next to each…

But why the heck do you call it inconvenient when you can just, you know, not use it?

They didn't want to spoil anything, since Infinite is very sensitive to that. This doesn't make a game look better than it actually looks, because it's obviously not gameplay. Maybe they could have made it more obvious, but that's another problem.

I don't think that's too problematic because it's clearly a CG teaser, not a gameplay trailer.

Qatar's.

I never thought about it this way, but this makes a lot of sense.

I stand corrected. Return to Castle Wolfenstein really wasn't made by id. But you're sidetracking and changing the subject. That's not what you had said. You said there was only one non-DOS game made by id. That's incorrect. Quake II, Quake III Arena, Doom 3 and RAGE are id games and windows games. And great games,…

So I propose we use Catherine as a test. Play it with your girlfriend. If she sticks with you, then she loves you dearly. If she breaks up with you, then it wasn't meant to be.

Well, I've been hearing a lot of people arguing that losing screen real estate is bad, so splitscreen is bad (which is just stupid). And apparently developers have been hearing that too, because there are almost no 4x splitscreen games coming out, except for some fantastic indies. And Nintendo.

whatever.

That makes sense, but I guess it depends on the games you play. If you're playing a shooter of sorts, then yes. Those are games that demand focus for long stretches of time, so usually people will be staring at the screen the whole time (although when I play with my friends we can't stop talking). But have you tried…

True. That makes sense. But I've seen lots of players who keep arguing that "splitscreen is bad. It makes the screen smaller. Online is a lot better because I have the whole screen to myself" To me they just sound like people who have no friends, but what do I know, right?

Also, in console makers' defense, Halo in 4x…

But that's the point. That's not the only game they've made since the DOS ones. Quake II, Quake III: Arena and Return to Castle Wolfenstein are Windows games. And good ones at that. Recently, other developers have been working with these franchises. But still, they've made Windows games. Oh, and let's not forget Quake…

"Playing a tabletop or board game means spending time with your friends, your family, your loved ones."

I think you may be putting single player shooters and competitive multiplayer shooters in the same bag here.

What? Quake II, Quake III: Arena and Return to Castle Wolfenstein exist and are proper Windows games. And what do you mean by "The new wolf looks good but it's not out"? It's most definitely out and has been since may.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/201810/

Dude, Wolfenstein and Quake are also id franchises. Other people have made games for these franchises, but they are still id franchises.