A girl I dated got into that...and I think tried to actually sell me a set. The relationship didn't last much longer.

Probably a bit of water mixed in with accumulated dust/dirt/grime.

I wonder if she's as chill as that one episode of The Boondocks depicts her.

HE REAL MAD.

There are a lot of logical fuckups in how our gender role system is set up. This is but one of many.

That "place the blame on the victim" logic is baffling. By saying "she shouldn't be on Facebook" incorrectly blames the victim for the actions of another individual. Furthermore, it takes away the agency of men to you know, not be assholes. Blaming the victim says that "men just don't fucking know any better" when…

Of course the comments go to, "she shouldn't be on social media." You know, because this guy was probably not going to burn down the house of the next woman he was attracted to.

Blaming her is like blaming someone that was rear-ended in a car accident. "Oh, well you should've been checking behind you the whole time so…

Why? So homeboy can be a "big man" in front of a woman he wants to impress. The thing is, I've yet to meet a woman who likes a guy that is an unprovoked asshole to people.

Samantha - That's a damn good, stand-up chef right there. Amy - I think you need to hit that dude with legal repercussions. You were underaged, and those other lawyers pretty likely to be witnesses. It'd be one thing if he hit on you in a somewhat polite manner, but what he did, that's a legal asswhoopin' in the…

If he were anyone else, $100,000 is a lot of money. But he probably hasn't changed his lifestyle, lives in an expensive area, and probably has a lot of legal problems to lose money on. So for him, in his (what appears to be) self-made disaster, it isn't a lot of money.

You're on a subway. Shoulder width, no more. If it's really crowded, then bring the knees in. It's not that hard.

Their response to everything is boots on the ground. Which all sounds good to them until they've gotta get their boots on the ground, and then it's like, "OMG, MAYBE DIPLOMACY." Meanwhile, the rest of us are thinking, "dude, Russia is about to bleed itself to death."

Yeah, might as well buy it all up now before the economic shit flies off the fan (because let's be honest, it's already hit the blades.)

"Currently facing trial."

"25 counts."

"75 counts."

And this guy was allowed to remain on duty?

No clarity needed, I got ya.

Ugh. No one said they don't. No one is advocating going out and shooting cops (at least, they shouldn't be). No one is saying, "well, that dude shouldn't have been jaywalking/selling cigs/holding a BB gun in an open carry state" equivalent shit to cops about getting shot. When a cop killed on duty, no one seriously…

I can agree with that. It's weird, I don't normally wish a beatdown on someone, but Rourke's ego probably needs to be straightened out with an actual, proper boxing match.

Goddamnit, trigger discipline. Don't just be lobbing rounds downrange because you "heard something." Shit, it's hunting deer, not fighting hordes of SS along the western front.

Furthermore, why are people hunting near running trails or off deer leases?

Similar situation - one of them said "eff it" to police work because he just couldn't deal with the problems in his department.

The other one I know tries hard to keep doing it right. Interestingly, he's also the one having to make defense statements about how law enforcement needs to improve how it deals with people…

The law enforcement community has a lot of cleaning up to do. Yelling at someone for calling them out makes their stance look worse and at the same time, it makes them look blind to their own internal problems.

"Don't yell at us for hiring a cop who was wholly unqualified to do police work, who subsequently went…