apocski
Apoc
apocski

What the hell is Subaru waiting for? How many special editions have the put out now in the last 10 years that have had <10% more power? Just feels like they’re not even trying anymore, or don’t see the need to remain competitive in the power segment. Sure, these cars can be a lot of fun to drive as they are, but

Very much doubt that would inhibit most buyers if they were honest about their needs. I reckon most trucks haul about as much as most sports cars get used on a track. But I agree that the perceived need will keep some buyers away, even if they’ve never once hauled something. 

Except in this case it sounds like the wife has rejected going to see a therapist. So where does that leave him? 

They’re not. Rubicons come with 33's now, formerly 32s. No other trim level has come with tires that size standard, except some special editions.

You can get third generation cts-vs in the mid 60's now. With a factory 650hp I don't think the extra power in this coupe is worth the older chassis, interior and other items given up compared to the new car.

On paper, yes it makes sense. The max you’ll pay for data is $60 a month, on top of the 20 for call/text. So your highest bill will be $80 (assuming no phone payment/insurance). So that right there almost cuts your current bill in half. I haven’t had coverage issues anywhere I’ve been. When I landed in London my phone

The 2007 335i we bought is still going strong. It’s modified to heck too, and no major issues. My dad bought it, then I bought it from him, and now my best friend bought it from me. Like Margin of Error said, they’re not as bad as people seem to think. Watch out for the earlier TT V8's though . . . 

Reading is hard.

Sorry, I misread your post and thought you meant you could get by with 4wd/awd without either. 

In Oregon they don’t regularly differentiate. It’s traction tires or chains, regardless of 4wd or 2wd. My wife’s car is AWD, but early this year when we went to Cali we had to buy and carry chains to be legal. 

And that’s likely because the material will build up quicker in front of lock wheels than wheels that haven’t locked. So there it’s not really the tires stopping you quicker, it’s the material build-up in front of the vehicle.

All of which are true for the Raptor, I agree, but not so for the Wrangler. 

Yeah, absolutely nothing like those drivers who own track-focused cars but never take them on the track . . .

He does offer to pay for the damages though. He even gives the (assumed) owner of the place a fat stack of cash.

Give it a shot. As annoying as Hammond is, he’s one of the heroes that has HARD counters, Sombra being one of them. If he’s hacked he’s a lot like Doomfist, where he can’t do much of anything. I main mostly off-tanks in comp, Roadhog being one of them. So long as my team is paying attention, landing a hook on him is

Mcree, Doomfist, Brig, Roadhog, Junkrat, Sombra. All of them can stop his roll. I would be mad if Hammond forced a singular counter-pick, but there is a range of heroes that shut Hammond down hard. Honestly if you have a decent Sombra and the enemy team doesn’t change of Hammond it should be Freelo in competitive.

Not sure that's correct. They do use radar, just not lidar, which most cars with blind spot monitoring don't have anyways. 

Can I have your autograph? I’ll add it to my entitled badass collection. 

After reading this article, then reading the NRP article, and returning to this article, I tend to agree with others in the comments that this headline is very sensationalist.

Sure, but 99% of the population won’t know and won’t care. They’ll see their choice as pretty binary. Do I buy an electric from a company that’s been doing it for 10+ years, or do I buy one from Mazda who just put out their first electric car?