Setting aside the “false” “public persona”—which, if true, isn’t a crime
Setting aside the “false” “public persona”—which, if true, isn’t a crime
So ... the Post story actually confirms the essence of Fairfax’s statement ...
Thanks for the information!
Yeah, in my relative ignorance of this particular case, and just going by what’s being reported here, I’m kinda confused why the Circuit court is expecting anything different the second time around — unless this ruling commits the District judge to treat the video evidence as factual? What is he supposed to consider…
but I don’t see what’s actually wrong with the force pull.
I’d wish Apple offered some more customizable tools for migrating your system.
I invite you to tell whoever is feeling discriminated against to sue me so that I can sue every studio that has left women out…’cause we can do this, if that’s what you want to do.”
1) That user is a troll.
Surely people know that the characters who disappeared have movies coming up?
The idea this movie is some kind of attempt to “steal Black Panther’s thunder” is incomprehensible to me.
He should have used the infinity gauntlet to, like, extract oil from half the universe.
Also a nice nod to Blade Runner.
“Oh, you’re seeing Star Wars? I’m not into that nerd stuff, I’m seeing Jumanji: Welcome 2 Jungle.”
so I was regaled by two different guys loudly commenting on how this movie is BORING, why don’t they TALK MORE?
her commanding yet soulful character, Vice Admiral Holdo.
I think it’s just that “Chrome Dome” screams out to me as too-real-world to me — like, its an insult you’d actually hear in this world. “Walking carpet” is a bit more generic in my eyes — and not something I’d be likely to hear on the street ;-)
But you’re right that the prank call felt super out of place
It’s not acting like a spoiled brat to block legislation that you are ideologically opposed to. It’s also not being a spoiled brat to collaborate with like-minded people and exclude those who are actively working against you.
I think Watson is saying that if dems continue to be outmaneuvered by republicans through the myth of “bipartisanship,” then there will be no advancement of progressive policies.
No, it isn’t. If it were “designed” to require compromise then there would be a requirement that all bills need total agreement from all legislators to pass.