All the great looks, 10% the maintenance upkeep. Sounds like a win-win to me!
All the great looks, 10% the maintenance upkeep. Sounds like a win-win to me!
So you're ok with punishing your constituents because they might choose to join a union and you simply don't like unions? Or closing bridges to punish people who don't support you? This isn't the behavior of a leader - this is behavior of a THUG.
http://wallstcheatsheet.com/politics/econo…
Hilariously, Corker tried to parse what he said:
Satanic Cult?
I'd be pissed off, too, if the actual company employing the workers was fine with unionization but local right-wing politicians constantly threw out threats of loss of work to influence the election.
The company will profit, the workers will suffer. Companies hate unions because it forces them to treat their workers as equal instead of as lower class proletariat. Solidarity!
You're right. I'm sure that VW arranges all of the benefits that German workers get out of the kindness of their hearts and it has nothing to do with the organization and support of IG Metall. (That was sarcasm.)
I read this from city-data since I didn't really know what was going on that part of the country, it's a somewhat stable job for the area
Alternately would you prefer the serfdom of company towns and child labor?
Yes. Its a protection racket. But the thing its protecting against is the 1890s, which employers would be more than happy to return to.
As the controlling individual, a civil court would deem you their landlord, regardless of whether you're the owner or subletting. Landlords cannot turn off heat, electricity or basic telephone access or create unsafe or hostile conditions to compel payment. Penalties for doing so include fines and jail time. Instead,…
And a stash for all the doobies one can smoke, that will really tie the interior together.
That'll buff right out.