The federal justice system in Canada has such a thing called Dangerous Offenders Designation. I believe it is vastly underutilized.

Either that, or they go the route they took with the 25th anniversary of the Montreal Massacre. “We have no idea why this man, who left a note specifically saying he was going on a rampage because he hated feminists and thought any woman in an engineering program must be a feminist, would do such a thing. Gosh! It’s a…

I logged into my university’s library page & am looking at the full study now. From what I can tell by my skimming, these authors’ findings are consistent with past findings on juvenile offenders & gender, but not many researchers have looked into this particular issue. Presumably the researchers here are looking at…

No one is saying that boys aren’t exploited. The writer of the petition is female, so she was speaking to her own experiences, and asking for the elimination of a gender neutral term.

People should stop using the term “child porn” for the same reasons. They are films and photographs of rapes

Can we also “child sex” to that and “child porn”? My local news loves those and I always have to make a stink. One of the stations has a handy little graphic for it too <vomit>

sex with a child is definitely always rape. children can’t willingly consent to sex, they are too young to understand the implications of sex because their brains haven’t yet developed the complexity. it is ALWAYS rape and abuse, not consenting bartered sex, when it’s with a child. always.

Not if you watch the video. The interviewer looks deeply puzzled, offers his the way out to say he’s joking. He doesn’t take it. Asks again for clarification: “You’re not joking?”. He says, completely flatly, “Serious”.

I like to point out the recent massacres of Muslims committed by Buddhists in Burma as a way to blow “lol religion of peace” morons’ minds.

Yeah, but a LOT of people think of Buddhism as an enlightened exception. This is a reminder that it really isn’t.

All major religions are fucked up patriarchies! Just a reminder.

They are DINO’s (democrats in name only). The richest on both sides DGAF about it at all. It’s not a left or a right problem, it’s a socioeconomic problem and they are all watching us dance a jig.

That’s exactly what I was thinking when they showed Claire Danes. She totally had white guilt face: “I mean, *I’m* not racist. There’s roles! Everyone loves Scandal!!!! It’s not my fault!!”.

Yes! So disappointing, but why did I expect better? Amy Poehler in particular looked SO over it. Maybe she was tired, but at least try to look alive when someone makes history and gives a touching, heartfelt speech! And these people KNOW they are on camera and just don’t give a shit.

And in a room full of the people who are in charge of the system she's challenging!

Black Girls are Magic! It’s lit as hell!

God that speech. That speech is worth Tatiana’s loss.

I have a theory/It could be bunnies

Oh those are the best/worst.

I suggested a app called (this name is up for revision) “Tinder for couples to find other couples not for kinky stuff but just cool other couples to hang out with because we need some mutual friends who live in this city”