Thank you for your research. I was taught that if you're driving correctly on the highway, you shouldn't have to touch your brakes at all until you exit. I've always wondered who these people are and what their motivation is.

"Most Drivers Suck at Driving, Study Reveals"

That practically makes us brothers.

You cyberstalk your old cars?

No, but it negates the entire GOP and any politician who claims to be against "Big Government."

Please name a single president who didn't work to expand the reach of the federal government.

I call bullshit on this whole concept. George Carlin noted decades ago that no one ever gets laid on Thanksgiving. It's not just because the coats are on the bed. It's just an impossibility.

Remember how great it was to ride a bike when you were a kid? You should try it again sometime. I think you'd like it.

Whose streets?

Richard Nixon set the national 55 mph Interstate speed limit. I think he would resent your implication that speed limits are somehow leftist in origin.

So you're backing away from your position that poodles carry less genetic information than wolves?

You have continually referenced expressed traits as "genetic information." They are not. Herp-derp you're being stupid.

Because you still cling to the notion that "genetic information is lost" by selective breeding and it's plainly not.

And again, you have evaded the issue that genomes have been mapped. This is settled science. You've got tons of irrefutable truth staring you in the face and you're desperately grabbing onto semantic straws, I presume to rationalize the possibility that humans are not apes. "They" are telling us everything we need to…

You have misunderstood recessive genes. You can have 2 organisms who do not express a recessive trait mate and the recessive trait will appear in the offspring. It happens all the time with blue eyes and red hair.

Yeah, you're doing exactly what I was talking about. You refuse to grasp the scope. Of course no breeder has seen a line go from toy poodle to wolf in their lifetime. No breeder has overseen more than 30 generations of dogs. You need thousands of generations to see that kind of differentiation and you have to select…

Who says you can't go from dog to wolf? Sure you can. You can select for any traits you like. And if you have enough time, you can make a wolf out of any animal you want. That's something I've found creationists consistently won't accept. One kid pointed at a building and said to me, "Would you say that building…

You keep changing the terms of the discussion. To close out and circle back to your misuse of terminology at the outset, you still haven't made the case for artificial selection reducing genetic information. You talk about traits which I presume you view as being more noble or interesting, but in terms of observable…

Hold on. Which is it? Can artificial selection add "genetic information" as you say, or can it not? You can breed a Saint Bernard with a chihuahua. They're both dogs. You can breed a wolf with a dachshund. Somebody's gotta get something new in those genetic transactions.

So you're saying that genetic information can't be added to an organism, except for when you add genetic information by cross breeding with another organism?