Surely seems to be spinning to its death.

You’re right, we don’t know if Matt donated or not. But this shaming trend is bullshit. I don’t know about you but I can acknowledge the guy and his liabilities and still praise him for his donation. 

It appears from the comments that the author (and perhaps Gizmodo) is a bit out of touch with their readers.  Huh.  Sounds all too familiar.

Well, of course, it’s much worse than that.

+1 for all of the replies above. Referring to the article, I guess that it has become cool to be negative and dismissive...

Matt Novak doesn’t have $33 to his name but if he did, the only thing he’d donate to is Antifa.

I get that this site hates really rich people or whatever but you would think the guy stole $14 million from a coronavirus fund instead of donated $14 million the way this article is written.

So what? He’s under zero obligation to donate. They now have $14.5 MILLION more to help with research.

I’m guessing right before posting this you donated $1,000? I’m sure you anticipated the “how much did you donate” questions and prepared accordingly... right? I mean, you can’t knock only donating the equivalent of $33 and then only donate $33, so it must have been more than that to avoid being hypocritical... and…

How much have you donated? 

Pandemics might be good for online retailers, since folks seem to be avoiding brick and mortar stores. To a point, of course. Unit sales and all. 

Ok. But he still donated $14 million, which is no paltry sum. It may be self-serving, but it will help.

“Tech Billionaire only donates 14 million dollars for a cause I haven’t donated anything to.” - Gizmodo writer

I wonder how much Gizmodo and/or Matt Novak donated. I bet it’s $0.  The high horses around the G/O Media sites are looking pretty damn high lately, aren’t they?

Right? Shame on him for not giving all of his money! Insert eye roll here.

The average American household hasn’t donated $33 to help develop a coronavirus vaccine. I’d guess most haven’t donated at all. I haven’t. Have you?

“Government transparency” is not about binding the law to favor the whims of some congresspeople. The law, as it is, does not allow OSHA to give that information. 

The fact that the blogger wrote a number of incorrect things in this blog, and we still have people taking these as “facts,” shows how fucked we are as a society.

If the records are private and members of Congress don’t have special permission to get them anyway, then there is no “stonewalling” by OSHA by not giving Sanders the records.