NOOICE!

Brutal.

It’s market-wide because no matter how big or small the overall asking price, current owners are not willing to pay X amount of dollars for a player who is likely to produce only 1/2 of X in value. Why would they when they can roll the dice on 3 cost-controlled young guys for zero amount of dollars.

So it’s collusion that every owner agrees spending $150m on a free agent to get $100m in value is a stupid business decision?

Blame them for going on strike because the CBA they agreed on makes signing FA bad business?

I always wondered if/by how much he’d be faster in a RWD car.

TURD IN THE PUNCHBOWL. I REPEAT, TURD IN THE PUNCHBOWL.

....nice.

Porsche brake system > any other OEM brake system.

Or, understand that a performance model has performance brakes, and that performance brakes squeal and it’s not a line of “BS.”

Guess now we all know you didn’t really need the “F” part then, huh?

Do we want it to be clear PI? Do we want NE to get a bigger victim complex? I’d rather the Eagles perfectly anticipate the play call and jump the route flawlessly.

Brady throws a pick-6 to end the game on their first OT possession.

TL;DR.

That’ll be the endurance series.

Even the wealthy don’t pay cash for everything.

I got angry reading that.

TFW one of your writers gets roasted so hard in the comments you gotta speak up even though it was financially illiterate nonsense.

I guess I just don’t get the point of tying up 100% of the cost in an non liquid asset when I could pay someone 3% to borrow that same amount and make 7% interest investing that amount elsewhere.

What a horrendously bad take.