anotherburneraccount16
DontGetButtHurt
anotherburneraccount16

LOL, You must be joking right?

I joined a gym back home in Puerto Rico, with the contract worded that I could get out of my contract if I moved 100 miles away.

Why’s this on lifehacker ... can you send it to jezebel ... I mean thanks, but I came here to read about bluetooth speakers ‘n shit.

Amazon’s profit margin is 0.77%:

because the unions know better than those stupid little employees so it’s only fair that the union comes in and takes a cut of their paycheck to “take care of them”

Except, when they don’t. I worked for Jewel and their union was fucking awful, useless and corrupt. In fact, I never came across a union that didn’t involve skilled labor to be worth a fucking shit. They take more money from you and you don’t get any real representation or benefits, just doing full-time work for

You’re not going to get massive unionization like that at Amazon or anywhere else for one simple reason: People are not willing to die or go to jail for the cause. Their shitty job isn’t so shitty that it’s worth dying over making it less shitty if they don’t die. This isn’t like people working in factories 100+ years

Police and fire are funded at the local level. Flat federal taxes wouldn’t affect your local services.

I can only imagine that the oh-so thinly-veiled disdain liberals have for certain parts of middle America is in no way responsible for their unwillingness to vote for liberals.

If you are going for situational examples...I’m sure we can find some cases where the system is completely abused.

Shouldn’t the government help the poor to take care of themselves, instead of just taking care of them?

And most people would just be waiting on the tides to rise.

Philanthropy is fine and dandy. Show me a good charity, though, and I’ll show you an idea that could be practiced on much larger scale by a government.

Gosh, if only there were historical examples of how radical government-administered redistribution impacted an economy and the people living within it.

Noam Chomsky disagrees with you. He asserts that media censorship comes in the form of the industry only recruiting, hiring and grooming people who posses certain political ideologies. That the other opinions never make it through journalism school because they either self select out or are made to leave.

I would say more like “Fuck Everyone who voted” but who am I kidding.. It was like choosing which poison to take. The ballot read, and I quote: “You want the red restriction of freedoms or the blue restriction of freedoms? Either way, you will be fucked in the ass. XOXO Republicans & Democrats”

Pretty scary stuff. Unions are an option, certainly, and I would never discourage anyone from joining a union.

RE: The regulatory attorney. I fear *this* will be what Obama’s legacy winds up being (especially if the ACA is gutted/repealed). Every batshit crazy decision trump makes will be caveated in history books with “He was able to do this because Obama consolidated more and more power in the executive branch through

The power to tax is the power to regulate. Something no government should do to a person’s beliefs.

My church has none of these things: