Shut up woman.

I'm not exaggerating when I say this is possibly the most pitch perfect comment that I have ever received in my time on this site. Thank you for the laugh.

She's a girl actually. I actually think hunting for sport is atrocious but I recognize that policy based on my personal moral compass is ill advised. Again, are you assuming that all species of elephant are extinct? Because that's patently false.

are you? Not all elephants and rhinoceros are endangered. certain species were. Which kind did she kill?

Totally will.

She didn't specify. A lot of people think hunting period is wrong. I think it's important to draw a disinction.

Nope, you don't. But you shouldn't call all people who kill animals deprived either.

Because she was an unprecedented case and there have long been questions about the effectiveness of post exposure prophylaxis. She had a known exposure. They were hoping it wouldn't come back. Much of the medical community viewed it as a waiting game, which it turned out to be.

I agree. Killing for food is still killing a defenseless and unarmed animal. She called people who do that depraved. I don't think it's wrong to want someone t0 draw that distinction when issuing such a condemnation.

I don't have an issue with her post. I have an issue with anyone who is not a vegetarian who eschews using leather/suede etc in their wardrobe calling people who hunt "depraved."

Great point.

Go forth and spread this new found "wanting to know things before levying judgment" curiousity to the world.

Completely. I think a lot of people don't get that.

You may have just singlehandedly restored my faith in the internet commenting community.

As long as you cite the gifs, I'm good with it.

REAL TALK, BLUEJEANS

I agree. There is a significant difference to me between trophy hunting and hunting for food. She didn't draw a distinction. A statement like this

Just out of curiosity, are you a vegetarian?

It's very strange that they chose not to put her back on medication when she reentered care, even with her non detectable load. She was a landmark case so, to some degree, her care was going to be experimental but it seems like a hell of a risk. That didn't really pay off. Hopefully the meds will quickly push it…

I'm retracting my comment after reading the linked article. Her doctors made the conscious decision to not place her on additional therapy (motivated, I assume, by blind hope). As soon as levels were detectable, they resumed medication.