Dude, “ the desire is always there (somewhat)“ is true for me too and most women I know. That doesn’t mean we want to have sex with anyone and everyone. It means we want to have pleasurable sex with who we want to have it with.
Dude, “ the desire is always there (somewhat)“ is true for me too and most women I know. That doesn’t mean we want to have sex with anyone and everyone. It means we want to have pleasurable sex with who we want to have it with.
You don’t even have to be an older virgin. I had sex for the first time when I was 17, I did it because I really wanted to have sex, the sexual desire to really get some D started when I was 16. Before that I thought I was going to remain a virgin and only wanted to make out with boys but by my junior year of high…
Little do they know even as a virgin a gal can tell good sex apart from mediocre. The first guy I had sex with was also a virgin so, for me, getting laid was nice in the sense that it was better than no sex but I still knew there had to be more to sex than what I was having. We broke up soon after that, not by choice…
I wonder if the question was asking for a man they think should replace Jackson or Hamilton, if any of them would ever say “My daddy.” or “my son.” I’m sure my father/son wouldn’t even cross their mind, instead they would immediately think of popular male figures from our history who they admire. Since it was asking…
Not sure what a libertarian means to you, I wouldn’t describe myself as one though. Your stance on getting worked up over someone’s actions even though it doesn’t harm others sure is a very right-wing way of thinking. Not sure if you are one or not, but that logic of yours sure is morally corrupt!
If something doesn’t harm others and is with in that person’s rights to do and you still have such a big issue with it then you’re the problem and on the wrong side of morality.
Umm none of that was illegal. So what’s the issue? The woman did nothing she wasn’t allowed to, it was nothing that wasn’t with in her power and most importantly it was nothing that makes a person untrustworthy to serve us. Good god how is doing something thats with in your power, not illegal at all and doesn’t harm…
Welp if you believe so then go ahead, I’m listening.
Its totally fine to believe one candidate would deliver more/better results than the other. We both want to see the same changes, I believe Hillary can accomplish that better than Sanders but if Sanders win I wouldn’t be too disappointed and would hope that he proves me wrong. What I see happening now days is people…
Welp no one has yet been able to give me a legitimate reason why I should believe otherwise. While I’ve provided tons! So I’m going to stick with other people not knowing enough about her.
Yes, it meets the requirement you set for making a candidate worthy.
That’s not what I made it about. I said perhaps that might be the reason. I’ve said above that I don’t know exactly where the misconception about Hillary comes from and its possibly a mix of factors. One of them I think might be the fact that she does not come off as a womanly person we like. And i blame that on…
The problem with Hillary people have is not that she’s a woman but because of the way she is as a woman. Had she been a more feminine more what we want a woman to be like, the implicit bias against her wouldn’t be.
What myth have I fallen for? All I did was state a fact that those false accusations were mostly always made by white men against black men. As the article above itself states that the testimony of the victim wasn’t even needed nor was the victim needed to identify. I didn’t discuss anything other than that simple…
It hasn’t been white women who tried to screw over black males but actually white dudes. The author of the article failed to point out even though the author pointed out key situation him/herself. The victim identifying the rapist wasn’t even needed. What happened in the past was, white men were obsessed with lynching…
I’m having this discussion with like 5 people at once, so sorry about mixing you with the others who were putting Hillary down. People have a very misinformed idea of who they think she is and I really can’t figure out exactly what it is. It probably has to do with bunch of little things and people just liking a new…
“Not hate. Personal preference. As I said, met her. She was a ruthless power hungry person then, and it clearly hasn’t changed.”
A vote with a crazy low turn out will happen if people aren’t excited and determined to get a Dem to the presidency. Whether we have Hillary or Sanders in the white house won’t really be a loss for progressives, what will be a HUGE loss for progressives and the future of our country is getting a republican in the…
As a political scientist I understand the bias in how news is presented to us and how public perceives it and as a law student I do go straight to reading the official reports and the actual law rather than the pinch of truth with a whole lot of opinion/misinformation presented as “news.”