anomalyyy
anomaly
anomalyyy

That’s really what terrorists do. They spread terror to control. That’s exactly what this kind of sexual assault aimed at women is about. Those who believe in some level of male supremacy and want to maintain it, use the fear of sexual assault to control women’s behavior

Plus there actually is a children’s day.

“women are too sensitive, this behaviour doesn’t negatively impact us macho macho men”

It’s not accurate at all. ZeKang is just being dumb. Female people are more likely to be victimized in almost every situation. A woman and a man in the same situation, the woman could face violence for all the reasons the man could also but on top of that she could be victimized because she’s a woman. So a man and a

You’re not very good at analyzing data or critical thinking. Just because stats show that when a child is harmed it’s most likely to happen at the hands of someone closely related to the child doesn’t mean a child’s relatives are more of a danger to the child than strangers would be. It’s that a child is more likely

If it does prevent women from getting STI then it could also prove to be beneficial for men. If most men start using this method of BC then that would mean less women contracting STIs, less women with STIs would mean lower chance of men getting it

I didn’t say anything about google and how they operate. Not sure if you read what i wrote but i was talking about what we as a country care about and deem important.

No it’s not monetary assets it’s not caring about crimes that women are the victims of majority of the time and men the perpetrator. We care about things in which men are equally or more likely to be the victim

Well the bill says it applies to touching that is intentional and for no legitimate purpose. So bodies touching because it’s a crowded subway when there’s no way not to wouldn’t count. It’s not hard to differentiate between touching that is for a legitimate purpose or unintentional and touching for the purpose of

It is really sad how often this happens. I wish it was possible to make sure the dad is the one who actually does the childcare when it’s “his time” with the kid and not his mother or new wife/gf. But that could result in the child just being neglected during visitation time with the father. I guess the only way that

A crime in which a person is targeted because of their actual or perceived race, sex/gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity can be stopped though. Which means most sexual assault cases can be stopped if we focus on the actual problem

I couldn’t agree more. From my experience the dudes who fight to have more time with their children and keep their exes from moving away don’t even care for their children when they’re around. They either have their mom watch the kid or their new girlfriend. It’s really just about getting back at their ex somehow

They’ll probably get all embarrassed about having to label lady parts and know about them and make a big deal about having to take this test in “mixed company”

I have a degree in this field actually and you haven’t made a single point yet. No there is no worthy evidence for what you’re claiming

Yeah I thought she was really hot and loved watching her on screen but there’s no sexual attraction there. I’ve always felt that way. There are plenty of women who I think are incredibly gorgeous and I love looking at.. I mean like stalking their instagram/google image page for creepily long period of time and every

I don’t think you understand basics of science or scientific law and theory. This is how people get caught up in pseudoscience.

I think it’s simply fashion trends. Maxi skirts, maxi dresses, dresses that land below the knee, dresses with sleeves, colored and button up shirts, and super comfy yoga pants result in less skin. I remember early 2000, only spaghetti strap or strapless dresses were cute, low rise jeans and most summer clothing trends

Taking political positions on questions regarding science is a very much a conservative thing. Feminists are usually very much progressive thinkers, so I doubt this is something many feminists would do. I have little patience for those who use pseudoscience to prove their political positions though. If it was ever

You said that having this certain violent gene means a certain segment of the male population is just going to commit sexual violence. Now you’re changing it to mean something else. So if wht you’re saying now applies then that means even those with this gene can be nurtured to not commit sexual assaults. So then we

It wouldn’t be the first time we’ve seen conservatives do that though. Just look at the obama care debates by conservatives. They complained about how everyone had to get obama care now when it was a republican mandate added to the bill that resulted in that requirement. Or the fact that this health care law was