True. We can do this all day.

Of course it's a discussion - it's the start of one, at any rate, with the comments being the next step in the process. And even if it weren't, this is the AV Club's site, and each writer can DISCUSS (or, if you prefer, write about) his/her topic of interest as she/he sees fit, subject to the site's publishing…

Oh good grief - you don't understand hyperbole when you see it? Of COURSE the study's results don't hold true for every individual - why on earth would you even presume I meant that it did? That's just absurd - and you're obscene.

It's called DISCUSSION. Jesus. This isn't brain surgery.

The only people being dicks here are the people who want the whole run of the web to themselves, and NEVER allow other people who LIKE discussing plot points the space or freedom to do so. Plus, we have science on our side, so, there's that.

THANK you. YES it's great - or at least I'm glad they did it. So tired of the spoilerphobic bullies. Science is on our side - spoilers do NOT decrease enjoyment.

Well he's got five now and you only have one. Did you? (Seriously, this is grade school stuff and I'm kind of embarrassed for you now.)

Here's a tip: If it's already aired, it's not a spoiler.

That was epic. You win the internet.

OK - what, now? I am a little flummoxed at the disparities between what I just spent a few hours watching and the work described in this post, most of which can be neatly summed up with a single study in contrast: You write: "Emblematic of the film’s prosaic style is the portentous weight lent to the title of…