Sheeran could be a thousand times worse, and your argument would still be irrelevant, idiotic garbage.

It’s pretty clear here Sheeran needs to win. The real question is why so many litigators are so gung-ho for making him the defacto hero of all these legal battles. Also could they pick a pair of songs with more obvious copying than “these are vaguely similar if you cover your ears and hum a bit”?

The worst crime here is “an investment banker named David Pullman (the guy behind Bowie Bonds, an investment scheme to make money off of David Bowie albums)” 

As much as I enjoy a good headline about Hobbits getting sued, it sounds like the plaintiff in this case is a real sack of shit.