Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    ankuramin--disqus
    AKA
    ankuramin--disqus

    Funny you mention Logan as when I saw that, there were a couple of college kids behind me that were so wasted they spent the first 30-45 minutes being a general nuisance (yelling obscenities, talking loudly, so on) until they passed out from their drunkenness.

    Considering my theaters serve craft beers with 7-8% abv in 32 oz glasses which I regularly down in a movie, no I don't think it's weird.

    Your post makes me sad because it reminds me of the things I hated the most about being a kid. I also liked Power Rangers, was bullied for it, and then spent a lot of time pretending I didn't like it anymore until I finally grew up in high school. I don't really agree at all that it was dumb and worthless, I think

    The old school Power Rangers also usually committed two to three episodes on origin stories a season…pretty much every season started with them getting new powers or Zords in some way which to me is just as much exposition as any movie.

    IMO all of these giant mech-robot franchises are better as animated shows. Like Voltron, which has an excellent show on Netflix running right now.

    You realize one of Bryan's first roles was working on the 1st season of PR - right? And that the producers named Billy Cranston after him because they liked working with him so much? He likely took the role for nostalgia reasons alone.

    Catching up on the last few episodes and man…this has to be one of the best season over season improvements of any show I've watched. This show has just been pure fun all season.

    Butler likely chose to do romcoms and action movies himself to make more money…your post makes it seem like someone is deciding what he works on for him.

    How does that make a difference to the original point - whether or not theaters are innovating? Theaters are brick and mortar businesses which identified a problem (people can watch movies at home with more ease and comfort than ever before) and spent a lot of money to put in bigger and more comfortable seats

    Just because you don't like something doesn't mean it isn't innovative. Movie theaters basically rebuilt their businesses from the bottom up.

    He couldn't be more wrong IMO. Theaters have added alcohol, good food, bigger seats, IMAX, and more in the last ten years. They've done all they can to become more about having a fun night out vs just seeing a movie:

    Damn just wrote this above…should've read below.

    I know it doesn't technically count as it's same network with different name but Supernatural has been on so long it started on the WB.

    Why did you add "ENDS" to all the titles except for X2?

    I don't think any school would bar students from watching auditions if they wanted to - mine definitely would have bitched out students if they were jeering someone else. But this is the same school which allows Cheryl Blossom to step over everyone in school-organized activities so who knows.

    I still want to really like this show but there are just so many puzzling decisions with the good mystery. The mystery of who killed Jason is genuinely good but Archie is just such an uninteresting character (I also think the actor portraying him is subpar at conveying realistic emotions) that at this point, the only

    I know it's technically correct but never have really agreed with putting Oscar-winning in front of a movie title unless it wins Best Picture.

    To be fair, they reportedly tried to get Paula Patton back and their schedules just didn't work for MI5

    Did you consider Brooke may have been unhappy about the uncertainty of what her third course would be in the final competition? Or that she may have thanked Shirley but the producers cut it out?

    Geez man, it's just a reality cooking show. When you start thinking about throwing bricks through TVs over who wins Top Chef, you may want to reconsider your investment in the show.