Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    ankuramin--disqus
    AKA
    ankuramin--disqus

    I liked that movie - haven't seen it since high school but there was nothing wrong with it. Had a great cast from what I remember.

    If you read recent interviews with Feige he clearly treats Spider-Man like it is part of Phase 3 and almost all online references for the MCU (including wiki) list it in there too.

    If Wasp is Hope in the movies though - she wouldn't be a founding member of the Avengers…right? Unless maybe they'll juxtapose Janet's fate with Hope taking the mantle and we'll get two Ant Man and The Wasp stories.

    If Infinity Wars is anything like the comics, half of those characters will be killed off the second Thanos assembles his gauntlet.

    My guess is one will be a new Cap or IM movie (which could also be a bigger event type movie like Civil War), one will be GotG 3, and the other will either be Dr. Strange 2 or a new character depending on how Strange 1 does at the box office.

    Black Panther is not being bumped back, it is being bumped forward…

    I think most people already knew about Jobs arrogance…even when he was still alive there were stories about how difficult he was to work with.

    I agree completely…(other characters who were cut include Harley Quinn, Captain Boomerang). DC's TV stance is just flat-out stupid and misguided. People aren't going to stop seeing their 100M CGIfests just because a certain character is also on a much lower budget TV show…

    I think Kord was name dropped in an earlier season and I know the EPs originally planned to have Blue Beetle in last season instead of Atom before the DC higher-ups put a kibosh on it (presumably because they had plans for Blue Beetle in the DCEU).

    Fair enough.

    Why does there need to be a Russian mafia compound on the island? They already explained how Oliver has ties to them in S2…he saved the life of KGBeast on the Island who grants him captain status.

    B means the same thing on this site as they do on others - that it was a good episode of TV. People on message boards are the ones who treat B's like D's…

    Except Marvel, unfortunately, doesn't have the rights to use Skrulls (at least in movies). Seems unlikely they would do a Skrull invasion storyline as great as it could be.

    All I meant was if they were confused with Loki being in the movie, why wouldn't they also be just as confused with that scene out. Neither was confusing to me, but I did find the whole sequence to be incredibly bad writing.

    So question…does the same test audience which didn't like the original cut watch the new cut?

    No I didn't say either of those things - I just said I didn't think your "joke" was good. If it makes me a dick for critiquing it, so be it.

    So bro, you're saying you understood the intent of the OP's post was to say The Martian looked like a mighty fine looking movie and then decided to make a quip about Jurassic World not being good? In that case, you're at least guilty of telling an incredibly shitty joke.

    I don't find someone clearly misreading a post and replying to it as funny, nor do I think it's funny when that poster pretends like it was supposed to be a joke all along.

    No worries - was going to say I didn't understand what you meant haha.

    I mean they couldn't really explain the plot without showing Damon stranded on Mars. They didn't really reveal much about his time on Mars (some clips of him growing crops to survive and the crew deciding to rescue him).