???

I said pat! Pat pig!

…and, conversely, your service staff do not have the opportunity to make anywhere near as much money as American servers can (and usually do). I'd rather go back to being a cocktail waitress in the US, where I regularly left at the end of a six-hour shift with at least a hundred dollars in my pocket (and at least…

I'm a "Trumpist" because I understand that "rank and file" means the general public, as opposed to the elite?

Where in the world are you getting the idea that I'm a "Trumpist?" Did I even mention the man?

The murder weapon they didn't find?

Bull. It sure is/was a unique case, and our system is not set up in order to force innocent people into prison—that is the exact opposite of how it's intended to work, in fact.

I'm pretty sure the session/s was/were not recorded (or the tapes were destroyed, "lost," or whatever).

True, and true. I was just making a general point (as I'm sure you understood).

It's also not unreasonable to assert that there's a possibility that if she was a black woman who looked like Halle Berry, she would have gotten a lot of attention, though, just as it's not unreasonable to assert that if Knox looked like a picture from the People of Wal-Mart site she wouldn't have gotten anywhere near…

I don't think either of them could be held responsible for catcalling anyway, since what you're talking about happened almost a hundred fucking years ago.

Please show me where I shit on other countries here. (And it's clear you didn't/don't understand what I was saying re "justified," btw.)

Where did I do that, exactly?

Yes. The whole "she took a karate class once, so there's no way a large man with a weapon would have been able to attack and subdue her by himself" theory is so ridiculous it's almost laughable.

My husband and I are counting the minutes until Luke Cage. Sweet Christmas, we're excited!

Hey, how much education does your unelected ruler-by-birth have? Which school did she attend, again?

What part of "rank and file" do you not understand, genius?

Very, very true.

Yes, by all means read a biased website that pretends all the "evidence" wasn't misrepresented, mishandled, contaminated, or fabricated entirely.

Yes! The facts of that one are so far from the way the case was portrayed in the media; it's honestly shocking and disturbing to realize what the press did there.