Even in the Wiki article, they point out some of the problems with the hypothesis- like that it ends up requiring there to have been a previously unknown (and still unknown, outside of the hypothesis) civilization that built *something* on the sites of the Giza pyramids some thousands of years before the Egyptians. Or…

This is the second deliberately-ignorant Cattelan-bashing piece on Gawker Media within a week. I hope GM fully realises that this is a perpetuation of exactly the same type of wilfully “my ignorance is as good as your informed perspective” genre of non-thought that your writers ascribe to Trump supporters.