Right?! He’s gorgeous!
Right?! He’s gorgeous!
Eh, I just bought an epilator. Not as rewarding as plucking but a damn site faster! LOL. Bearded ladies unite. ;)
Don’t most people have herpes, though? Just the asymptomatic or cold sore kind? If it was syphilis, I could understand the reactions but herpes? I really did not think there was so much stigma about that one. Not that there should be stigma about any STD.
I guess so. Although even that nonsensical argument is moot for me since I only own one pair of shoes! LOL.
Well, to be fair, shooting people is only illegal if they are white...
Surely the difference is that alcoholism only kills the alcoholic? If we extend it to drunk driving of course.... Oh, wait that’s already against the law. So...they are making a pretty awful argument. Now you can of course include deaths by alcohol-induced fights, accidents etc. but it’s impossible to reliably tell…
8 guns per person. That is insane! Why the hell does any country need enough guns to have 8 PER PERSON?!
Two perfectly reasonable responses to the situation, one horrible click-bait title.
“That’s not a boob window, that’s a boob conservatory!” - My fiancée. I can’t stop laughing.
Stupid clickbait! That does sound great, though. If they can have the yoga that they want *and* be educated on its origins, spiritual basis etc. then that’s even better. No appropriation & free exercise. Win-win.
I don’t know what the other issues were (if there were any) as the poster didn’t comment again. I guess physical accessibility? Maybe the way the class was run? Or the range of exercises? *Shrug.*
That is a much better title! LOL. Who gets these fact so wrong?! *facepalm.* If it is the case that only the disabled course has been cancelled that is really weird. If it’s the same teacher and the same type of yoga etc. then that *is* seriously ableist. Someone on here said that the appropriation was just one of the…
I don’t disagree with that. :) I guess I just don’t think that this is the place/scenario/etc. to do it, since it’s already specifically for disabled people & whilst people do still conflate them, I think that’s problematic. Still no disagreement on your general point, though! :) Haha. Oh brains, sometimes moving too…
Haha. God is black but he only bothered to make white people. Makes perfect sense!
I thought that was odd. Also, I think there is supposed to be much less gender dimorphism in those who are nutritionally challenged, and they vary in different races as well, so it seems a bit strange to refer to the skeleton as a female with male chromosomes rather than a previously misidentified male. (Not that that…
Yeah, but my boobs make the skull look funny.
I see. You are a linguistic purist. That is a perfectly reasonable criticism then. I am glad that it is not the content to which you object. I will endeavour to be as linguistically archaic with you as possible in any future communication so that you take no offence. Thank you for the advance warning.
I feel like the two are conflated by laymen all the time, so just not using it would be better and free from *any* ableist implications. I dont know why that is so controversial which is a bit confusing. But I’m glad I managed to explain it a bit better this time! Sometimes it takes me a while to articulate exactly…
Thank you very much. I am trying to be reasonable! LOL. Sometimes we will all disagree on things. I have been on the end of those comments myself, although my partner gets it much worse. I think people find it harder to shame you that way when they find you are autistic as well! Haha. I really think that is a big part…
But it is. It is for everybody even those who aren’t helped by it (psychologically) in any way but still enjoy it. The name change, however, makes it pseudo-psychological. If it isn’t a treatment or coping strategy or blah blah...it isn’t worth existing. So those who don’t want mental health help or who know it…