angrypicard--disqus
Angry Picard
angrypicard--disqus

sure bruh

Go back to Breitbart, troll.

The one time I bothered to look was an extreme fundamentalist-Christian pushing flat earth to line up with their version of the Bible like the description of the cosmos and Hell being below the ground.

You are not taxed on dues. They are tax-deductible for you and tax-exempt for the NEA. You should start writing that off if you aren't already, it's a business expense.

You're not getting doubled dipped. They're separate coffers. One goes to retirement and the other to Federal expenditures. If you throw taxes on the NEA though, you'll be paying taxes on your dues. If you are annoyed by the already existing taxes, how does adding more help your position?

Either they support business like a Union and get taxed indirectly, where the beneficiaries and the employees get taxed, or they are charities and society is using them, not the other way around. Do you really think Habitat for Humanity needs to be charged for the privelage of helping others with no benefit to

Their lobbying helps you and school teachers. It works for salaried people who already pay taxes, not stock owners who make direct money off of it year over year. Why would you want to pay even more money? Do you want to have less spending power in the economy or do you want Trump to have greater freedom as president?

As I said, there are problems with a lot of tax law relating to charity, whether it's educational, religious, or corporation based. But Goodell gets taxed. So do teams. The 2 things that don't get taxed are donations to charities, widely affecting black kids as players choose the donation, and player unions which help

Because the NEA isn't a corporation. They don't make money. Their employees do (which gets taxed) and they make money for teachers (which is accounted for). If you deposit $1,000 in your first year then work for 40 years, that 1000 will make you 45000 after 40 years at 10% annual return. Tax that return at 20% flat

NFL-it's just an HR office. They coordinate for teams. Each team is a corporation that actually makes the money. They all get taxed. The NFL office gets salaries (which are taxed) and fines, which go to charities. There is no true revenue to tax. No one owns and makes money off the NFL. It organizes, but it doesn't

It's rude to refer to VP Mike Pence as 'her'.

It would be roughly 5% of Hillary's campaign, which isn't small. And that's only directly reaching 16,000 people annually, of which are senior citizens , not considered the most elastic voters. There would be positive press, but negative as well, with accusations of bribery and extortion, hijacking a charity, ect. And

On the chance that you are serious, that would kill its charity status and force taxation while probably pulling all corporate funding. I don't think Dems want to pay 7+ million dollars a year for that.

Breen certainly seems to have a really bizarre, conspiratorial, and angry ideology. He seems to have a weird "benevolent dictator" liberalism where he can save the people from the corrupt capitalists by whatever means necessary, including violently murdering millions of innocents if need be. I agree that "Fateful

An alleged Twitter troll behind a virtual attack that caused Newsweek senior writer Kurt Eichenwald to suffer a seizure was arrested on Friday for cyberstalking. The suspect faces federal charges and could face additional counts in Dallas, where Eichenwald lives, according to the writer.

It could very well be just be standard attempt to avoid libel charges. The "alleged" seems misplaced, but it's pretty universal to use it in ongoing criminal proceedings, and it is a newsweek article about one of it's own writers, so any mistakes would look particularly improprietous. The article itself states that he

Is it really any more mean-spirited though? Fateful Findings ended with him forcing a bunch of men into committing suicide and Double Down featured him placing dirty bombs in every city for, insurance I think? Spite?

I've recently decided that there is value in these moving pictures, but I don't get this "sound" gimmick.

That would actually have a pretty significant footprint. Humans are inefficient converters of energy, and the food production necessary would release significant amounts of greenhouse gas, namely CO2 from forest clearing, CH4 from livestock, and N20 from agriculture, and those last 2 have significantly greater

Or a wig for Kate Mara that resembled human hair.