Yeah—you do have a point. I hate it that men—even decent, well-meaning ones—think our space is theirs to invade.
Yeah—you do have a point. I hate it that men—even decent, well-meaning ones—think our space is theirs to invade.
Cox’s comments are a clear rejoinder to Trump surrogates who have claimed that the Times’ story “trivializes” sexual assault
All of the “smaller” violations build up over time, they are part of the air we breathe, and underlie the numerous doubts that keep us from coming forward in cases in rape. They contribute to the atmosphere that this is just how things are. That our bodies are not our own.
The cognitive dissonance surrounding sexual assault is truly one of our greatest intellectual failings.
Trump’s razor: the stupidest explanation is the best one.
Me too! Journalists seem very confident that lawsuit would go nowhere though (story was clearly in public’s interest) and that Trump’s full of threatening bluster (and little else). Also, the Times has great insurance + lawyers. So I’m not worried about them. . . .They don’t seem worried either: they just re-tweeted…
The word on the street (and by “street,” I mean “twitter”) is that he is threatening the journalists w/ lawsuits (I believe he has threatened at least one woman too). Journalists are like, BRING IT THE FUCK ON because they seem fairly certain that he won’t survive discovery. They all want a reason for lawyers to…
People also need to be reporting on the story from Kamie Crawford (warning: it is both extremely misogynistic and extremely racist). There are about 18 tweets—starting with this one
Yep. Seems like bad strategy, everything else aside, to play this game, given he ADMITTED to sexually assaulting women.
Nope, it’s no small thing at all. I’ve also experienced what I call the “upper-ass pat,” wherein a man only rubs the juncture between your butt and your back.
*Rip up my Bill Clinton for Prez* sign
Apparently, he can’t find his phone right now, but, don’t worry, his surrogates are on the case!
Hey ladies, guess what?!
YES! Let’s do this thing!!
Me:
Hey folks, can we tweet-storm Kellyann Conway? Her weaponization of sexual assault—which only serves to further silence victims/bully women—is really starting to get stuck in my craw. Thus far, Conway and the campaign have used allegations of sexual assault against Bill Clinton to provide some immunity to Trump.
Oh, also, this interaction between Donald and a ten yr old girl happened:
Two more came women forward in the last hour:
Here’s a pictorial summary of a subset of my reactions to this week’s news. . . . .
Why do they need a “morality clause” to fire him? He sexually harassed co-workers while he was employed at NBC. NBC would be in some deep moral + legal shit if they forced women to work with someone who has demonstrated predatory sexism towards his co-workers. (And no I do not care that it was 11 yrs ago).