I have no opinion on this, as I have seen none of their performances, but “pickle juice on a burn” is pure gold.

LOL. However, as a fellow flatulent-traveller, this was the only part of the entire crap pile that I appreciated.

Which is a damn good reason to love a movie!!

I like her and think she has talent—but from what I’ve heard of Joy—and just her seemingly constant winning—does have me suspicious.

The MARTIAN won for best comedy? It was hardly funny. I chuckled. Like, maybe 4 times? It also (to me at least) had a tired kind of feel—more 90's than current (and not in an intentional way).

I didn’t want and don’t intend to. . . . .does anyone care to highlight some of the more offensive moments? (Ricky Gervais is the Worst).

Oh! I’m sorry. I totally misunderstood you. I completely agree w/ what you said. I’m sorry for having called you aggressive!!!

Yes! Even if there wasn’t some suggestion of him being in cahoots with the prosecution, everything he did was just despicable. That CHILD was left alone w/ adults who did not have his best interests at heart. A (likely false) confession was coerced out of him. And he was intellectually disabled. And, at trial, there…

YOU GUYS I THINK I JUST AGREED WITH SOMETHING MARCO RUBIO SAID AND NOW MY UTERUS IS ALL LIKE

I, too, was delighted when I saw it. Those two. Man. Those two.

No, I don’t blame them either. I really enjoyed the documentary. There are pieces of evidence that I think could have made it stronger if they were included—but, as they have pointed out, they couldn’t include everything. And it seems like they didn’t include a lot of evidence that would have made Avery’s case even…

Yeah, I remember that and it seems pretty awful. They were barred because they couldn’t argue for the alternate suspects’ having a motive. Which is kind of bizarre b/c any motive they could have supplied would have been just as good as any motive for Avery having killed her (what motive did he have that would have…

Me too. But we’ve got competition, apparently.

Yeah, I get that there are good reasons why the filmmakers didn’t include these details. Like I said, their inclusion wouldn’t have changed my mind about the central point of the story. I kind of just wish they had included some of this info—mostly because people are using it to discredit the story. That being said,…

Yeah, I agree. Like I said:

I haven’t really seen/heard any details about the manacles except that they were there (and someone just suggested they were fuzzy and pink. . . .). . . .And yeah, I think Brendan’s story was completely coerced.

I’m not sure why you are being so aggressive? In the comment that you are responding to—I specifically said that none of this evidence would have changed my mind. Not that you should have—but if you look at all of my other comments on this thread, I say at multiple points that Kratz is a scumbag, that I liked the…

From a prosecutor’s manual, for your education :)

The DA is so disgusting beyond words. I heard in a podcast yesterday that the defense team was deliberately not trying to play the case out in the media. So not the case with the DA.

Yeah. . . .I could care less about what that DA says. . . . .From what I’ve read, the handcuffs and potential previous harassment from Avery were the only pieces of evidence that could be important. Neither of these pieces of evidence would change my mind about the reasonable doubt introduced in the trial. But I think…