I’m still irked by the changes they did to multiplayer. Lack of Titan shields absolutely blows and makes Titans more of a battle of attrition.

I loved the original Titanfall. I had hoped that with Titanfall 2 they would deliver the same multiplayer experience along with a campaign that would help the franchise reach the masses. But then they had to go and retool multiplayer, fixing what wasn’t broken. And then they released between the 2 biggest shooters in…

This has been a weird release for me. I liked Titanfall 1 and was very excited for Titanfall 2... and I dunno, I’m just sorta meh right now, on the multiplayer at least.

Completed the campaign on the default difficulty in one sitting. It was good but not worth the overwhelming praise it’s getting from most reviewers. Maybe the bar has been lowered in recent years, but too many beats were just a tad too generic for me. I did enjoy the personality Respawn gave to your titan, BT, and the…

As a huge fan of the first Titanfall, the second one is quite disappointing.

For a 50 year design life with high volumes of traffic? The thing that kills roadways isn't a single application of a big load, it's the repeated application and the fatigue and ongoing strain that accumulates from being loaded and unloaded over and over and over. I am a civil engineer BTW.

I also have a 4kw system that I am struggling to maintain and get it to pay for itself. I hope insanely impractical feel-good campaigns like this don't sour people against crowd sourced science. If you read through these people's website, their gee-whiz claim of being able to produce 3x the energy the country needs is…

we can do a better, cheaper, simpler job now just with all the huge rooftops we have in warehouses, etc. but yet we arent for some reason.

Never understood this kinda BS ideas. Here is why.

There is a difference between "having an negative attitude" and realizing that something is a pipe dream that will siphon off billions of tax dollars that could be going to actually do something to help people.

Glad that this got posted. I work at a geological/geotechnical engineering firm, and my boss and I were just talking about how colossally cost-ineffective this would be, in addition to a lack of durability. If several inches of asphalt placed and compacted in layers over baserock and properly prepared subgrade…

The industrial design art students have found a way to short circuit the design process where engineers get to tell them their idea won't work, at least not with their concept of technology.That's not to say the fundamental concept of a photo voltaic and light emitting element embedded in a roadway could never work.It…

And this is one that will never be ready for it's time, untill we've run out of other surfaces to cover.

But..but does this mean all those posts on my facebook feed are wrong? It's not the solution to everything wrong with the world and the government isn't a big group of dumbasses for not funding it? /s

it's not a bad idea, it's just an incredibly useless one in our time. There are better things to make into solar energy collectors before we do it to our roads.

Please don't compare this asinine idea to cars. There is no reason that we should even think of putting solar panels on roads until every rooftop is covered.

Also, roads are not flat, these things are. This will require ass-tonnes more work to make the subgrade perfectly level, and then each panel is still flat, so you will be driving over faceted curve uphill and downhill. Not smooth at all.

In spite of all this, Kogai didn't explicitly say that the rotary is dead. He just said it's not viable at the moment, and implored people to "please allow us to continue our research" into how to make the Wankel work.

You know, I understand why Mazda canceled the rotary. Yeah, it's a bit low on the torque, though we could remedy that with a Variable Geometry Turbo a bit. But the big thing is it's gas guzzling problem.