Really hate her stupid, pro-theocracy rhetoric.
(and her stupid evil face).

Also, the conviction rate for accused rapists is abysmally low. Heck, I am not even sure someone like Cosby will get convicted.

And what makes you think that she didn’t do that and got laughed off or told that since she was a porn actress, she either was “asking for it” or “is not rape because it is her job to fuck people”?

It most likely was. And you’re still derailing, stubbornly trying to avoid the very real effect that MODERN violent pervasive mainstream pornography has on male behaviour. It’s not working.

What about guys who are into it? What about guys who are into it exclusively? When do you draw the line, and start making the judgments you’re afraid of?

So a nice circular argument then. Thanks.

Oh, pfftt, I am only here to criticise choice “feminists” such as yourself as I have deep disgust for this site and its fans.

You either haven’t watched porn at all or you’ve watched it so much that all the abuse and degradation women are put through in it are totally normalized for you. In the former case you’re a naive, ignorant fool, in the latter - someone who shouldn’t be expressing opinions about what is abuse and what isn’t.

You know that outlet theory - the idea that this porn is harmless or even beneficial - is pretty much dead, right, and that the links between porn and real behaviours are really compelling, scientifically speaking? And that objectification in general harms women? Right? You checked that before you decided that this…

When I was choked during sex to the point of not being able to breathe, and I ended up with bruises on my neck. Afterwards, I asked him, “what in god’s name made you think that was okay?”
His answer: “The girls in porn seem to like it.”

No. It’s a scientific issue.

As a reinforcer of the idea that hurting women is okay, that women are objects or fucktoys and not people worthy of respect. These shirts literally objectify Christie Mack, and that somehow is supposed to raise awareness of domestic violence and not itself turn women into fetishes.

I’m in the all porn is objectifying camp, but some porn is more damagingly objectifying than other porn. For example, pornhub has rape fantasy stuff.

Objection to porn is a moralistic issue. Objection to violence against women is a human rights issue.

Something about this rubs me the wrong way, so to speak. As someone else pointed out it kind of has that same “save the ta-tas” thing about it - yeah, money is going to a good cause, but I feel like the message may be doing more harm than good?

Yes, but porn that depicts violent acts- rape porn, extreme bdsm, etc. have a role to play in the discussion, particularly since this “awareness” campaign is sponsored by a huge purveyor of porn.

I watch porn and most of the shit is disturbing. Takes a while to weed through the gangbangs and forced sex to find something good. Feminist porn? What is that?

Aren't there vast sections of Pornhub that depict violence against women as a "fetish"?

She is brave and I think it’s great that she is outspoken about domestic violence, but these shirts don’t make a lot of sense in that context. I mean, she’s literally the comodity.

Are they also going to stop streaming rape-fantasy videos and videos depicting violent, unpleasurable sex acts as pleasurable?