There's a special place in basketball hell for advanced stats dweebs who use doctored, decontextualized numbers to shit on good players. 

Worse decisions have been made. I happen to think anyone who can score 70 points in an NBA game probably has the potential to be pretty damn successful if his teammates aren’t total butt. And considering just how godawful the Suns have been as of late, I would suspect that those defensive ratings are probably a little…

Holy crap! So many cringy statements in one article facts are facts but the main fact is Booker is 21 and one of the best players already in his position. And how can you win games when he was the only one!!! Not anymore! 😂

People are conveniently ignoring the fact that Booker is the best player on the team. He is their cornerstone. Whether he deserves to be is up for debate, but they view him as their franchise player. You have to admit, 25ppg 5reb and 5ast on 56% TS is pretty impressive for a 21 year old who consistently gets double…

Whether or not the Suns are bad is almost entirely irrelevant to whether the contract is good or not. It’s almost comical how irrelevant it is. Yes: Devin Booker has not, up to this point in his career, been able to lead a winning team. That’s absolutely not why they’re paying him.