Close. Not quite, but close. J. Herbin ink, and they’re very close to perfect. I own one, but will still take my 30-year-old Mont Blanc 144 over it.
Close. Not quite, but close. J. Herbin ink, and they’re very close to perfect. I own one, but will still take my 30-year-old Mont Blanc 144 over it.
Anyone who says flying is a “pretty cool experience” hasn’t been on a plane in, oh, 40 or 50 years. It’s more like a cross between being toothpaste and riding an intercity bus. With ridiculous class distinctions thrown in for good measure (“Our rose gold card-licking diamond triple-threat super customers may board…
That’s a small closet? I’ve lived in apartments that were smaller than that.
Yes, I’m serious. Those were the $$ names of the period. That’s not to say that other people weren’t using them or that people with those names aren’t good people. But yuppie films of the era often had characters with those names. They were certainly popular names:
In the early ‘80s, in Chicago, a friend of mine babysat for a gold coast high-rise couple who had named their children Ashley and Brandon. The epitome of yuppie-scum nomenclature.
Manual for the people!
What I remember about the Tans Sport (a brother-in-law owned one) was that you could fit an extra-large pizza box on top of the dash with no overlap. Glass like that looks good from the outside, but it’s seriously impractical.
Well then, heck, GOTO is good enough! I understand it. The computer understands it. Why bother with anything else?
;-)
Not that it really matters, but my degrees are in sociology (BA, MA) and law (JD), and I worked as a software engineer for just under 15 years before going back to school to get the JD. If you want to communicate with people, learn their language. Particularly if you want to call people names.
English is a programming language with its own rules. If you’re going to call me an idiot in public, please learn how to program in English correctly. Don’t begin statements with “[Y]ou having” and don’t use “want’s” when the word you’re looking for is want. Capitalization is also important.
1. Currently running Windows 10. I know it’s not a lot of juice being used, but see infra.
1. No Mac. I’m not kewl enuf.
It’s a matter of taste. When I’m not using my computer, the screen is off.
They still use CPU, and since you likely don’t have a CRT, what’s the point?
I had the same reaction. Pointless wastes of CPUs and batteries.
Bingo.
The intersection is interesting.
That was exactly my reaction. How does one even begin to parse that statement?
I vote hapless intern. The grammar is tortured. This is what happens when you consider education to be unimportant.
Everyone knows that Mrs. Landingham is God.