andrewhosking
Scooby Doo
andrewhosking

You also forgot piracy is why we have to suffer DRM in the first place. DRM on games was a response to piracy of games, not the other way around. So thanks pirates for making legitimate non-douchebag gamers who do the right thing and buy games instead of stealing ‘copies’ of them have to suffer for your actions!

They made mistakes and they started going down a really bad road but they have apologized and taken a step back, rescinded the trademark claims and copyright infringments which is adequate for me to fogrgive them personally. Fact is you cant change the past but you can change the future, they took a bad path but now

I backed this on KS along with PoE so I clearly want to play this else would not have done so. I am glad it is shaping up to look like will be very good cRPG but I am more looking forward to Original Sin 2 currently.

I don’t want an emoticon creating monocle thanks...

(“\( o_O )/”)

I haven’t owned a handheld (primarily) gaming device since the original gameboy, even then it was bought for me rather than bought myself. I played games on lynx and gamegear when I was younger too but I just do not enjoy playing games on tiny screens in general which is why I have little to no interest in buying a

I don’t think being first party like Sony, Microsoft or Nintendo should matter in the long term after a certain amount of time has passed on certain games. I can understand that the benefit of restricting first party titles to their own platform initially would be good for them but long term I think they should port

No, it was just wishful thinking. I am aware of my head being in the clouds in terms of hoping they would start porting more titles to PC like Squeenix is doing a lot these days with Final Fantasy franchise. Namco also giving PC more jRPG’s in terms of porting Tales series and Nihon with help of Xseed porting Trails

I am glad they removed/removing the petting mini-game and also happy to hear they changing the homophobic part but I am disappointed that this most likely will not be released on PC (I assume) of which is my current primary gaming platform. PC needs many more jRPG’s in general including ports of older ones from

I never said I do not know anything about it, that is just an assumption your making in an effort to discredit my opinion. Taking photos of little girls in their panties is a currency in the game yet you try to pretend it is not sexualisation via anime styled representation of young school girls, an easter egg of big

Awww...did Twitch block your anime style sexualised school girl murder game from being streamed on it? I know enough about the game to know Twitch did the right thing blocking it on their service which they are legally allowed and entitled to do. Guess you’ll have to get your jollies from watching it on another

Sexualised or sexualisation does not require having actual sex portrayed in game. The game is extremely focused on naked little girls and on little girls in their panties, that is sexualisation of fictional children.

Good, it is a shit game for creepy closet pedos that get their jollies from sexualised mass murder of fictional little girls. There has to be a line drawn somewhere and they are a private company who are very much legally entitled to block such a game on their service if they want just like Kotaku which does the same

The last time I played a battle chess game was on an old RM Nimbus PC back in late 80's/early 90's but by any stretch of the imagination these days the franchise can no longer be called triple A in scale or development cost, the latest one released especially given the reviews and level of quality.

Yeh, Battle Chess: Game of Kings came out december 2015.

To me I would sum the game up as Fallout 4 is not a bad game overall but it is certainly not a great Fallout game. Fallout 3 and New Vegas were much better overall games in the Fallout franchise.

As far as a news story goes this to me is scraping the bottom of the barrel. It’s beating a half dead horse called Interplay, it’s right up there with publisher X owes me £100 in that nothing great or even good will come from winning such a case, for such a small amount and from people who no longer create games of

I never said they shouldn’t get paid what they are owed. I said I think nothing good will come from it in terms of the franchise or future games from those people and that I do not really care that much for either party involved. It is a measly amount and hardly worth the effort of going through litigation and like

I am thinking that is the case too but to be honest I doubt they will do anything much with it even if they got it back. The amount of money trickling in from sales of those old games on GoG etc is hardly going to fund a large scale, high quality sequel.

They are not trying to hold onto any glory, they are for the most part silent and out of the spotlight. They have only published like one game in the past 3 years I think which was Battlechess, hardly a triple A game... To be honest I doubt they even make enough money to pay much of their debts and whatever money they