andrewbare29
Andrew
andrewbare29

Oh. My. God.

So did I. Made for a “...OH!” moment for me while watching tonight.

I have some degree of liking/sympathy for Saff and the producer, but I do get what you mean. As weirdly entertaining as the whole thing is in macro, a lot of the people featured are just...really horrible.

I mean, Carole’s no saint here, but given the evidence presented, I’d have an easier time believing Doc and Joe

I buy Ted and Robin as a first college/post college love, but not as a going concern, they wanted such wildly different things out of the age 30-50 period in their lives. Knowing empty nester widows/widowers, I do buy that a person would try to rekindle that in their mid 50s, because of the familiarity is probably

Is Jimmy’s resentment at the legal establishment just ultimately his continued unresolved resentment towards Chuck?

I disagree, and I’m a huge fan and writer of genre fiction. The problem is not that these stories use genre tropes — I think we’ve long since passed the point where literary snobs who refuse to accept genre fiction have much presence in the critical landscape. The problem is with stories that pull genre tropes out at

It’s funny, because it kind of felt like a backwards version of the first season of True Detective. You know, where they kept sticking in all these bits that made everyone think there was some kind of mystical occult element... and then it was just a dude. The Outsider did a really good job in the first bunch of eps

A few points to the team if they were planning on Hart being the assassin and Statham being the schlub.

I actually had a slightly different takeaway:

We call that the “Frank Langella/Masters of the Universe” touch.

It was just on yesterday or the day before, and I don’t think I’d seen it since it came out on VHS so I decided to give it a go.  It still holds up and is a lot of fun, and Allen Tudyk is always good in everything.

There’s something about Nacho’s pad that seems so communicative. It’s the sort of place that someone in his shoes is supposed to aspire to ... but that nobody—NOBODY—can actually enjoy living in. He’s so palpably a prisoner there.

Short answer, no.

nope!

I think the fundemental problem with rich people is that once you have a certain amount of money and power, people stop telling you that you’re wrong. We need a modern equivalent of the guy who whispers in Cesear’s ear “Remember you are mortal”. I propose that everyone with a net worth over, say, 40 million gets

if it’s based on Tom King’s run at all, I’m very excited.

Having seen the film, no. It’s not gonna offend anyone that isn’t already a misogynist. In fact, I kinda wish it went further. That said, it’s still very funny and very dark.

I think its the “complicated protagonist” thing he and other reviews have mentioned. Lots of people seem to have problems with ambiguous lead characters these days, and it sounds like this isn’t your typical revenge or thriller flick where usually the movie (and by extension the audience) thinks the violence the

Che clearly enjoys doing it and I say more power to him. People love serving up unsolicited criticism so what’s wrong with receiving some in return? (That’s a rhetorical question, so don’t feel compelled to reply to me.)

You could make a reasonably solid RPG out of The Stand (settlement building! crafting!), but at that point you’re really just making another Fallout game.