After the large September/October patch (the one that was supposed to fix a lot of the issues), I was able to run AK at max settings without any slowdown. I enjoyed the game did everything except for gathering the Riddler trophies. As such, I’m not going to be seeking a refund.

I don’t know. I played it a LOT and mostly problem free. I feel kind of bad about returning something I spent so much time with. (55 hours)

The game worked decently from day one for me and has only improved, I enjoyed the game even though I’ve yet to finish it, so asking for a refund would be a bit disingenuous for me.

I bought the game on release day and have beaten the main story and played a total of 19 hours. I am most certainly not requesting a refund. I was able to enjoy the game and it ran very well on my machine. While I can appreciate the refund efforts from the dev and/or publisher, this sickens me to think that people are…

Asylum and City were targeting very old hardware, but Knight is a game for much more powerful hardware. This has manifested itself with massively increased system requirements for a lot of games, but of course they usually end up running well on the recommended hardware.

Nah this was just a case of a really shitty port job done by a dev by the name of Iron Galaxy which already had botched another game prior to this one. WB tried to cut corners by using them to handle the port. Too bad it blew up in their face.

It’s a real shame that this seems to be what most gamers are remembering Arkham Knight for. I hope in 10 years time we’ll remember the trilogy as a masterpiece rather than “That series with two good games”.