analog-man
AnalogMan
analog-man

No brainer prediction: the Supra is going to be the least reliable, most trouble-prone Toyota in a long time.

And this car is “worth” roughly three times what a new BRZ or a new Miata cost because....

RE: Subaru and Toyota

But for the same $42K, wouldn’t you really rather just have the V8 GT?

This is what happens when we have an incompetent, avaricious bigot and a spineless, complicit GOP running things.

Thank you hotbascosauce!

108,000+ views and 427+ responses speaks loudly for how passionate people are about Wankels and the RX8 (pro or con).

LOL, thank you!!

Now playing

There are two kinds of people in the world – those who get the Wankel, and those who don’t.

+1 to Hunter. This is such a vastly underrated car.

I’ll second NegativeEd, knock off $5k and it'd be NP. 

Where did you hear this? Do you happen to have a reference for it? The Infiniti website makes no mention of a manual transmission being available, and my local dealers have never heard of it. 

It’s a major shame what Nissan let happen to this car. I’ve owned a 2004 G35 Coupe, 2008 G37 Coupe, and 2012 G37 Coupe, all with 6 speed sticks. They were fantastic cars, a very satisfying blend of sportiness and luxury, fun to drive yet comfortable and perfectly suitable for daily driving, reliable, and a hell of a

So, what do you think: this car, or a new 370Z for about the same price?

I test drive a Veloster N a few months ago. It was down to it vs a Subaru WRX.

BaT has become an on-line version of Barrett-Jackson, catering to Silicon Valley tech bros to whom money has a different meaning than to most other people. $33.6k (plus 5% buyer’s commission) is just walking around money to them. Just like B-J, the price paid might not be indicative of the rest of the world (though

I’m both an avid cyclist (ride almost every day) and a hard-core gearhead. I love both bicycling, and cars. I’m also originally from NYC, though don’t live there now. It seems simple to me:

I’ve read that Jim Hackett wants to increase profits per unit sold and is willing to see a decrease in total unit sales. OK, I don’t know of many companies that have shrunk to greatness as a brilliant strategic plan, but I think he’s out of his mind with this pricing.

How to avoid the BS pitches in the finance office?

Of course it was designed to be a money pit, for one reason: it maximizes profit for Lockheed Martin (and the other defense contractors).