TOOF-STEALING BAFTERD!
amoralpanic
amoralpanic
Glad you got a job as a result of furthering your education, since it appears that you failed to gain critical thinking skills from the pursuit. And, perhaps, basic empathy.
As others have pointed out, the minimum wage has not kept pace with inflation. The former really ought to be indexed to the latter, but even if…
TJ is referring to Josh Tomlin, who is starting the game tonight and has, as the above numbers indicate, actually been quite good over the last two months. Granted, he has been fairly mediocre for several seasons prior, so take that for what it’s worth.
dang ol’
First the Giants lose, and now this. Pretty good week so far!
Why is brunch-flavored candy corn a thing?
Rascal won an award, too.
Scott toilet paper is fucking garbage and anyone who says otherwise is a terrorist.
Scott toilet paper is fucking garbage and anyone who says otherwise is a terrorist.
GOD YES. I’m just trying to buy some fucking groceries, I’d appreciate it if you wouldn’t assault my ears.
If he has left any doubt, then yes, that shifts the moral calculus a bit. But it doesn’t sound like he has from his posts.
When you continually call one person garbage for perpetuating the relationship and give the other person a pass, that is laying the blame at one person’s feet (at least the lion’s share of it). To claim otherwise is a bit ridiculous. You still have yet to cogently explain why he’s scum and she’s an innocent victim…
No, I’m actually not implying anything. What I’m clearly stating is that someone who continues on with a relationship knowing that they have irreconcilable differences with the other person which makes them an incompatible couple is a garbage person.
Marriage: A legal relationship with economic consequences that people usually enter into emotionally.
It just strikes me as disingenuous to lay the fault for the relationship continuing solely at one person’s feet, when that person has been up front about their position on the matter from the outset. What you’re implying in your argument is that he has a responsibility to make the decision for her, otherwise he’s a…
Probably a retweet of Birds Rights Activist.
She’s an adult. If it’s important enough to her to be a deal breaker, she should be smart enough and self-aware enough to realize that and end it. If he were equivocating, that’d be something to criticize. But to call him out for “wasting someone’s time” when he’s been crystal clear about his intentions from day one…
Has been my credo ever since I first saw it.