I’m going to go with “He’s black and we didn’t know he had the money to hire a bunch of lawyers” for 200.
I’m going to go with “He’s black and we didn’t know he had the money to hire a bunch of lawyers” for 200.
I’m a Clevelander and I can’t think of a single one of my friends (and we’re all huge Tribe fans) who wants to keep Chief Wahoo. There are a ton of Clevelanders who are embarrassed by it. We’ve all long since ditched all of our Wahoo gear in favor of stuff with either the Block C or the Script I. Simply put, I think…
Somehow they miss the group of Native Americans that shows up to protest the home opener every year going back, I think, a couple of decades?
People were adament about still calling it the Jake. They got over it. As for people admitting they’re wrong, just cuz people are too stubborn to do it doesn’t mean that it’s good not to do it. So you’re wrong, it happens. In this case, supporters of wahoo are very wrong
I live in Cleveland. I never miss a game. It’s like how people said they’d never call it Progressive Field instead of the Jake and never call it The Q instead of Gund Arena. But they do now cuz it’s not a big deal. It’s dumb people refusing to change with the times and admit they’re wrong. One of them just happens to…
I don’t fucking get it. Just change it. It gives you a chance to rebrand, sell a ton of new merchandise, and come out looking better than Dan Snyder. It’s a win-win. And from a fan stand point, it’s not like if the logo changes that there will be a ban on wearing old gear you bought with the Wahoo on it. You can still…
No, no, he’s still standing so it’s totes okay.
Hey, it’s a proven scientific anecdote that if you give a poor working person more money they won’t spend it, they will just horde it or use it to invest in bitcoin. That’s the problem with poor people. They save all their money instead of giving it to rich people.
I know there are reasons in baseball world for roofs
But, his emails!
Police: “Freeze!”
It doesn’t really matter if they’re profitable or not. Even if Storycorps can’t afford compensation increases, having the union there to negotiate over working conditions and dismissal is still good for the workers.
Also... legally required. So, ya know, just baseline business ethics.
“Had the ballboy been able to sashay out of the way.” He is being a total dick about the whole thing.
I’d imagine it involves the daughters espousing liberal viewpoints and then either A) Allen’s character making snide “jokes” at their expense, or B) eventually some sort of plot resolution that shows the daughters why they’re wrong and/or some reason why both sides have a point.
I obviously haven’t seen the show, but how does a regular ol sitcom espouse conservative values? What were the plotlines? A daughter gets pregnant because she’s only ever had abstinance only education and Tim Allen forces her to carry it to term but doesn’t contribute to the upbringing of the child?
They could have picked someone who has actually led Bible study sessions in the White House. Instead, they chose someone who couldn’t be bothered to go to church on Easter.
It’s pretty simple. They hate women and brown people more than they love Jesus, and feeding that hate is more important to them to than anything they claim to believe in.
Because evangelism is basically white supremacy+gospel of wealth
Hmm. Thou seems fond of using the historically plural pronoun “you” to refer to one person. Why dost thou insist on such grammatically incorrect writing? To whom dost thou pander? Or does thou acknowledge that grammar changes over time, and maybe thou should chill the fuck out?