There's no shame whatsoever in the size of someone's penis. If, however, it is expressed in their personality as a hatred of women, then it is that expression, not the artist's physical reality in question. The essence of art is seeing what is behind it, what it means, what its motives are.

I'm not sure, which parts could it be? I'm happy to speculate given an example. How often do we speculate on the motives of Old White Men who oppose gay marriage, abortion, who are insensitive to rape and other issues? Artists who portray their little fantasies get a pass?

I think if you look at the culture of Japan, many crimes of a misogynist nature don't get reported at all. Things are better there as time goes on, but as in many cultures crimes against women are often seen as embarrassing or condemning of the victims. In addition, while crime in general could be seen as going down…

Yes, really.

Silver and gold, I'm afraid. Some require blood and guts and overt acts to understand brutality, misogyny, cruelty. Sadly that's why our culture is still saturated with such things and people stand around blinking ignorantly, wondering what all the fuss is. At least they do until someone they care about is murdered…

Yes, and it is certainly within our rights to speculate whether or not this art is the result of a very small penis, or hatred for their mother, or whether they got beat up by girl scouts. Who are you to tell naysayers what kind of point they can make? I have every right to laugh at the artist and run them down,…

I've been seeing a lot more of this junk lately on deviantart and elsewhere; photos with women having their throats cut, etc etc. Neo-sincerity in terms of disco, bad food and campy tv is one thing, but this is a bit beyond the the realm of acceptable. Art shouldn't be a shroud to "hide" their sick misogyny in full…

WWLSD? Run off with a Fenian chauffeur, evidently. The pants were the most obvious sign of eventual decline, sadly ignored...

Many thanks!

For better or worse language is a lot like mold, it's alive. People tend to point to dictionaries to prove words are or aren't correct, yet dictionaries are based upon usage, and bow to it, eventually. If enough people use something like flarharfenfarbar often or long enough, it will find it's way into official…

I'm sorry, but no, unless you foresee every reasonably sized city having one (or more) nuclear power plants. That's barely realistic in the US, and frankly we don't even want a good portion of the world messing with nuclear power, if you're keeping up with current events. Sadly, those are also the parts of the world…

Mike of... LA? I wonder if you'd be getting 130% if you were MikeofSeattle? If so, would you have a backyard dam or nuclear power plant?

Other points to consider are the natural resources used in making the innumerable, quite toxic batteries that would be required if the cars we drive now were all electric. How also will they be disposed of or recycled? With brownouts around the world already during the summer, how will converting our need for…

You could say that the distance in time between the change in history and the story you're telling proportionally reduces the reason to set it in a historical event at all.

It's quite a different skillset, wouldn't you agree? Regardless, we vote for the choices we're given, and we aren't given scientists. We're given a choice between people who work within a machine, and who though their interests conflict in some areas will in the end maintain that machine. Government is a business…

I'm not at all sure why, either. Why take complex, real characters that could be portrayed by actors and turn them into expensive, poorly done effects with no depth or personalities at all? It's the complete opposite of anything that the arts teaches us; making living, breathing characters into nothing.

The exact quote seems to be:

Once you accept these questions, then you have to start thinking of whether it should be cured at all. Do we have the right? These people have been made immortal, they aren't "sick" per se, are they just living a different lifestyle?

I don't differ with reducing our impact on the planet as much as possible, and as soon as possible, but I differ in the most fervent way with how the situation is being portrayed.

I wonder though if this benefit is totally a matter of correcting previous zinc deficiency. In places like the US, "supplements" are usually large doses over and above the amount we need, which may or may not be actually used by the body. This finding wouldn't surprise me at all in cases where the person wasn't…