Seeing as the circumference of the Earth is only ~25,000 miles and they flew 31,500… yeah I’d give it to them.

I remember reading, https://www.google.com/amp/amp.timeinc.net/time/3421587/diplomats-parking-tickets-new-york/%3Fsource%3Ddam ,  that the reason New York accrues so much in parking fines is because the UN headquarters is there. Foreign diplomats and their staff rack up lots of parking tickets then just never pay them…

Система «Периметр» spoken aloud would be “Sistema Perimeter”

Simple, any part on the back 3/4ths of an H1's engine. Every single thing is now under the dash or the center console. Granted you can remove the glove box and see some of the engine... just not engough to do anything meaningful. Spark plugs? No longer routine. Worst of all the PmD sits in the valley of the V8 mounted…

I wasn’t taking all of that into account though, it was more a jab at the fact that, given enough time, 100% of any radioactive material is turned into energy. So on based on that it is literally the most efficient source of energy.

Assuming you’re incredibly long lived, nothing beats radioactive decay for energy efficiency.

If an EOD could choose, he/she would rather know when and be in control of a suspected bomb going off. So that my have been the intent to detonate the bomb on their terms. Also C4 is extremely stable, fire wont even set it off.

When I was a kid (about 8) my dad used to work on pump jacks and would take me and my brother along, most of the pump jacks where down dirt roads and in the middle of corn fields. Once off the road we would take turns sitting in his lap and driving the car to the pump jack.

You mean #Bitten?

In principle there isn't much difference between an infrared sensor and a camera.

I think it is a beautiful car... I also understand that is the minority opinion. Perhaps I just have weird tastes.

The problem with determining whether or not a vehicle is off-road worthy is the fact that off-roading can describe a lot of things. Jeep people think it means rock crawling, truck people think it means mud bogging, Land Rover people think it means over-landing and most people just assume it's trail ridding. No car is…

Well then to answer your original question. I don’t know if the crash was survivable or not at 65mph.

Again, you are correct. But I don’t see your point. You asked if going 65mph would have saved him. I gave you my opinion and followed by confirming it, along with every other opinion, is meaningless. And you feel inclined to reiterate that?

You are right, but the question was whether going the speed limit would have saved him. Not how could he have avoided the accident, the answer to that is pure meaningless speculation.

I don’t know what the cabin on the tesla is rated against for shearing force so I couldn’t say if it would have saved him. Moot point though, he's dead. But 30% is not a negligible deference.

Just stating facts, not speculation. But if I was to speculate, if he had been going the limit for the entirety of his time on the road he probably wouldn’t have been in the same space and time the trailer was.

Already been said but worth saying again: Kinetic Energy increases quadraticly with an increase in speed, the difference between 65mph and 74mph is ~30% increase in KE.

I can’t believe they bothered to line the floor in plastic in the first place.

Well for starters, anyone should be able to judge anyone for any reason. Because no matter how hard someone judges you, it can never actually affect you. But if being judged brings you to use vulgar language to prove that there are other forms of entertainment than vulgarity. Then just be you man. But playing this…