Ha. No. Just no. For so many reasons.

I'm not bothered by people choosing the PC over any other platform. I choose to use my 360 for a number of reasons, but that's my choice - whatever. And yes, of course it can produce higher frame rates and resolutions.

+1

It began construction much earlier in secret during the Covenant war in the Oort cloud. Which is why Cortana recognises it when she sees it. It spent 3 years or so after the war being upgraded by captured and bred Engineers, who are utterly fast and amazing with technology.

I'm probably the only person alive who thought that a Bioshock-esque shooter set to a suburban 50's alien invasion looked absolutely awesome. As did the freakish oil stuff choking people.

I think you miss my point. Every time my 360 updates through the beta it takes about a minute. My PS3 takes about 15 minutes including a restart - honestly. My net connection out here in the village isn't great which you'd expect to explain that time, but that doesn't explain the disparity between the two.

The UK. Updates are often required before connecting to PSN. If I've got an hour spare for a few games I don't want to spend 15 minutes updating.

The last time my PS3 updated was less than a month ago, and I really don't think I am exaggerating. And I'm by far not the only one that agrees here.

Comparing features isn't quite fair. Consider the quality of those features too. It's a cliché, but I do indeed own both a PS3 and a 360, and while there's nothing fundamentally wrong with multiplayer on PSN I find Live to be a much smoother MP experience. I find matchmaking to be faster and match me better by all…

Agreed. Athletics should be about physical ability first and foremost. With a little bit of thought, planning and strategy thrown in for good measure.

Surely the gaming performance can be attributed to graphics drivers.

Everybody else sees the penis, right?!

Ain't that Fernando?

Surely that's Epic's prerogative to keep some juicy bits to itself. SK had the choice whether to licence UE3 or not, and if they weren't happy with the content or didn't read the smallprint on something so crucial, then they shouldn't have bought it.

Seriously...screw the internet, and so-called gaming purists. It may not have been XCOMy, but it looked solid with a cool 50s setting and art style and some great freaky goings on.

Add me to the list of people who actually thought the whole thing looked rather good. I'm a classic XCom fan too, so screw all the haters.

No, "he" doesn't mean that. I'm not going to lie and tell you I bury myself in books, but I do read, and I know what a good story is. And your statement suggests you never actually played the game I'm talking about and are making assumptions.

No mention of the Gears 3? I know people think it's currently hip to hate on 360 exclusives, but really? With all its great storytelling and visual highs?

And what if you've got a GOOD mobile phone?