They do if they have investors!

One of the inherent flaws of capitalism is that in order to see return on their investment capital, the investors need to be able to liquidate their holdings. To do that, someone else needs to want to buy them. Then they expect to get a return on their purchase.

Ditto.

Nothing is about actually providing a service or creating a thing anymore; it’s ancillary to making all the money.

Welcome to capitalism - this is the way. It objectively makes almost every business worse from the customer perspective all in the name of shareholder value. 

I mean, you play as a cop that goes into a building without announcing themselves, and immediately pulls a gun on the first person they see, and begins shooting. This rendered in police-cam footage often associated with police murdering people without due cause.

I cut boot leather out of my diet.

If it was REALLY realistic, the video would cut out before, during, and after every time you shoot someone.

Sir, you don’t understand. He took MONEY. From RICH people.

This man committed a crime and confessed to it. There’s no debate there, and he served an appropriate amount of time behind bars.

Right? We’ve barely allowed any of his victims time to cope with what’s going on and we’re already expected to give him a pass?

If you can’t understand the difference between an internal mental fantasy and publishing doctored photos and videos designed to imitate real people online where they will exist more or less forever and can follow you for the rest of your life affecting your career, relationships, and other opportunities, then I don’t…

In this thread we have skeevy pervs defending the skeevy perv.  Fuck off, all of you.

I watched deepfake porn of you, now, how can I help you get over it?

Well, from this very site:

so working conditions at activbliz can improve

I am hoping the FTC adopts the reversal of fortune doctrine for all mergers.
The doctrine would allow for the breakup of any parties requesting that the government approve a potential merger if a preponderance of stakeholders (i.e. posters) determine that the conversation around the merger has gone on too long and…

I just want what is worst for all companies involved, is that too much to ask?

I guess they can separate the art and the artwork when it comes to this one 👀

Why throw them away? Why not give them to people?

Who needs evidence? Capitalism is all about making money, and we require corporate executives to attempt to enhance value for share holders.

For the uninitiated, this is more evidence to consider that—when push comes to shove—Capitalism will always side with the regressive/Right regeimes when it comes to business.