if we're going to be pedantic, then statistically I love 0% of all "rap" music of which there are millions of artists and of which I only like maybe six or seven.

Orman's lawyer plans on appealing, since a 2010 law in New Jersey requires that palimony agreements be in writing.

when people say they love all music except rap, they are being racist.

you're not an idiot, you're just living in a fantasy world where every horrible thing will come with a warning beforehand.

"Even though I know this isn't true, I better say it anyway!"

here's a riddle: what happens when every white person stops caring about diversity?

Hey Jude (7 minutes and ten seconds) was a single.

This post is so absurd I don't even know how to dismantle it.

just to point out - Lena added black actors because people complained, and then made Donald Glover's character an insulting parody. So she's hardly better.

you sound like a real twit but I agree that any argument should be based on facts, not hysteria.

Ads themselves are for suckers. The purpose of ads is an entirely different discussion.

Very few WOC fashion models? Perhaps they're the lucky ones, knowing what we know about the fashion model world.

most banner ads require you to click them to be profitable, so I feel little guilt at not seeing ads I would never click anyway.

I think most sports are colossally stupid and bring out the absolute worst in a lot of people, so I think a, um, sport (activity?) like cheerleading whose sole purpose is for women to be dressed in creepy sexualized outfits and to dance in front of the aforementioned people is also colossally stupid (especially when…

is this satire?

fair enough. I think it's another issue that it's very difficult to tell which photos are copyrighted and which aren't. Since the FUD covers search engines, it's incredibly easy to find a copyrighted photo on Google or whatever and use it without ever knowing if someone owns it or not.

for someone who's so devout about this sort of thing, it's pretty crazy you don't know about the Fair Use Doctrine that AmellaE listed elsewhere in this thread.

what an appalling view to hold.

edit: I'm admittedly having a crisis of perspective in this instance. while mobile phones/twitter/etc weren't around in 2001, photojournalism these days seems more and more in danger - I can't imagine new media willing to pay actual photojournalists when their job can be done for free by the rubes in the street with…

edit: disregard. wrong about thing.