Oh, I guess that republicans and democrats support BLM in equal numbers.

Oh... Am I somehow magically forcing you to read my comments? Is my patriarchal privilege permeating your personal space on a public website on the internet and forcing you to participate in the conversation?

Please explain!

The irony of it? Am I forcing you to read what I say? Am I forcing you to participate?

Is the comment section of a large public website your personal space that I am invading?

The person I wrote those long comments to actually enjoyed our exchange, also you might note that they also wrote long comments.

You might also note that all those posts have a star, it was from the person I was responding to.

Also... does “don’t fucking touch me” apply to cops, how about politicians? Does it apply to…

Except that he was hiring women, hence the binders.

Well your definition of when it is and isn’t okay to violate someone’s bodily autonomy is completely arbitrary because the law is arbitrary.

If pointing out that resting your idea of when it’s okay to violate bodily autonomy on the law leads to self-contradiction then I guess I’m just a big ole troll.

So it was offensive because he dodged the question and it was ‘tone deaf’?

How is it tone deaf, because he was trying to hire women?

So if I am understanding this correctly, not enough women in government... sexist.
Trying to hire more women to work in the government... sexist.

okay.

how is “binders full of women” offensive given the context?

Well it was a fun exchange while it lasted, have fun on vacation and with your moving.

oh so your bodily autonomy can be violated when you disobeyed a bunch of people you never met who wrote some shit down on paper?

So if it were the law that abortion was illegal, that wouldn’t violate women’s bodily autonomy because aborting the baby/fetus is a crime?

The fucking entitlement is astounding.

No, and I apologize for the confusion. What I meant was that, since you used gang rape in an example, and then brought up the point about gang rape being okay because the majority have voted to take away the rights of another human being—not that you believe that, but that it is something that could be argued under…

do politicians and police have to follow this rule?

...you have so far been quite reasonable. I guess I should say thank you, but I’m not sure if that means anything to you at all.

many laws were chosen for us by proxy...

No I was mostly speaking about victimless crimes.

Generally using force to prevent violence is seen as acceptable, EG: if I pull a gun on you to prevent you from murdering a little old lady most people wouldn’t think I did something improper. But if I pulled a gun on you to take your money to fund a nearby park, or…

In any society, some will have power and be able to exert that power against others. In a just and merciful society, that works out well.

Say... paying for wars you dont support. If you refuse to pay men will come to your home to steal stuff to auction off, and if you don’t have enough stuff they will lock you up in a cage. If you try to defend yourself they will kill you.

Another simple example is suppose you enjoy smoking pot, men with guns will lock…

Do you really thing a very wealthy white woman in the united states is “non privileged”?

Fucking get real.

It’s the latter, the point being that much of our society is built around non-consensual relations, such as taxation and laws, which I presume you support despite their lack of consent of all parties involved.