Does this whole consent thing apply to ALL social interactions?

HOLY SHIT. This post is so fucking ironic. God damn.

Funny how this is somehow magically not an argument for keeping james bond or hermione white.

Actually cars don’t require any of that, driving on public roads do.

Idealy those regulations wouldn’t be on cars either, and the state wouldn’t have monopolized the roads.

Also if you’re concerned about drive by shootings, then you shouldn’t be concerned with gun control since most of those ‘drive bys’ occur in areas…

okay so is your argument that because bombs are deadly they should be illegal, and the same logic applies to guns.

Well... the same logic then applies to cars, or hammers, or knives.

No buy anyone can whip a gun up in their basement using simple tools.

Or you know... download a gun and print it from the internet.

White people are more than 60% of the population, but okay.

I’ll read your article after dinner, but I have to ask...

why is it that when liberals say “oh the mass shooter is CERTAINLY a white male!” before the facts are in, this is perfectly okay speculation, after all, white males make up ‘just under’ 60% of mass…

Funny way to admit that you were dead wrong.

And he’s black! how does that fit into your narrative?
Also he publicly pushed for a $15 minimum wage.

Opps, looks like you were wrong.

Older, black male, not underemployed or recently laid off. Advocated for a $15 minimum wage (hardly anti government or anti obama but thats all I know of his politics at the moment) and no confederate flags in sight.

You did get the assault charge right though, and if a restraining…

Wrong: He was black and it is reported as an isolated criminal incident. Not terrorism.

http://heavy.com/news/2016/03/l…

Hmm. Guess I wont have to wait much longer.

A.) so we should have a dumb law because there are other dumb laws?

B.) either the law matters, in which case you need to repeal the amendment. Or the law doesn’t matter in which case why are you advocating a new law?

C.) okay.

A.) murder, by definition, always has a victim. Guns don’t.
B.) Because “we” decided it is? I wasn’t talking about some sort of natural rights or rights intrinsic to the universe, just legal rights as codified by law.

So unless you repeal the 2nd amendment (haha fucking good luck) then you can fuck right off. because…

Heh, remember when that black gay guy shot 2 white ladies and you lefties started saying “wow they wont even call him a terrorist, probably because he’s fucking white!” and then it was found out that he was actually black and then suddenly it was just workplace violence and not ‘domestic terrorism!’ as the left was…

Huh that seems like moving the goal posts and... also thats not a citation of any sort.

Do you have a citation for your claim that white males are the ‘overwhelming’ majority of shooters?

Hmm.

Lets see... is an action that is necessarily harmful and unwanted to someone (murder) the same as an object which isn’t necessarily harmful (a gun.)?

Oh... no.

Is making an action with a victim illegal and a punishable offense the same as making possession of an inanimate object that doesn’t necessarily have a…

Really? White people are the “overwhelming majority” of people who use guns to shoot people? Got some citations for me?

Right, good point.

You can’t stop heroin because it grows from the ground.
Well at least the republicans should make some synthetic drugs illegal! Then nobody could do those drugs because they don’t grow from the ground and there is no such thing as a black market!

Missing the point. Also fun fact, a big chunk of that number is suicides.