that second one makes zero sense. The first one totally, but I don’t get the second one.

nah

nope. Still looks like ass.

Would’ve loved to see Fury Road win Best Picture, but I take some consolation in the fact that the Best Picture Oscar went to Not the Revenant.

Careful; too much logic makes Burneko’s head explode.

This is the same reason why it’s totally fine to steal from Walmart. I’m poor and they’re not. Fuck them!

Sometimes cashiers do give me the wrong amount of money back. If I notice they gave me a twenty when it should have been a ten, I’ll hand it back. I don’t need to fool people out of money that doesn’t belong to me.

Dude, come on. This comment is asinine and you’re making me want to defend the fucking Redskins.

Methinks you aren’t content without something to be outraged about.

We’ve learned not to presume anything about you. You’re a fucking hack.

Then perhaps he should have paid back what was owed? I know, fuck me for being logical, but still.

Albert, what is the minimum dollar amount for which a corporation should be allowed to sue? Is it a hard figure, or is it dependent on the wealth of the defendant? Oh wait, you have no idea, and you are making less sense than Brian McCann discussing unwritten rules.

Yup... them more common one you hear about is a bank error putting more money into someone’s account, then trying to get it back after it gets spent.

stop it dude. You sound like a fucking idiot with this take... not much different from your normal babble I suppose, but this is egregiously wrong. The player’s current situation has nothing to do with this.

Theft from a rich person is still theft.

I actually find it more grotesque that people think it is OK to keep money you are not entitled to just because the person giving it to you is wealthy and a bad person. That’s not how it works.

That doesn’t even make sense, they have no other recourse but to sue at this point, that’s hardly grotesque.