Yeah, and again, you're the exception.

Well, you're the exception then. Sorry.

Because you see the "real" pictures and you assume, this is a "real" person, and readers trust a review from a "verified" source more than an anonymous source. There's an inherent assumption that a "real" person is less likely to lie. This is not rocket science, in fact it's a key concept in online reviews and the…

I didn't.

But there's a difference between reviews you understand to be anonymous and those you understand to be under a real name. There's nothing wrong with the ones that are anonymous and I don't see any problem with someone wanting to be anonymous... both of us, for example, are currently anonymous. That's fine. But I take…

Who said reviewers shouldn't be allowed to give a negative anonymous review? They absolutely should. I mean, a review that's like, "You should do/read/see/buy this" is inherently more useful, but knowing what to avoid is also good. You shouldn't, in general, put things that are not true into a review, whether it's…

I think there's a definite undertone of "something malicious going on" — if you find the narrator credible.

Posting a negative anonymous review is a shitty thing to do, especially if you're writing things that are completely not true about a book. It's worthy of investigation and it's worthy of calling out ... but not stalking.

I don't think it should be scripted — I think celebrities should cooperate with the journalists they have sought out, and if they're not willing to, they shouldn't do the interview, instead of acting like an asshole.

Do you think they'd tell you if they did? Are you on the list of people Putin calls when he wants to restart secret military programs?

So, what do you think the purpose of her sitting down with GQ is? To talk politics? Think they want to hear her views on economics? Think they want to talk about those dogs in the picture?

You do realize that her desire to make money using her ass is intrinsically linked to doing press promotion for her ass-centric album and music video?

What could they do?

It's not slut-shaming, it's an entitled celebrity bored with having to do her job. Presumably the reason a musician sits for an interview is to talk about promoting their work — in this case it's the ass-centric song, and the ass-centric video. Nobody is forcing her to do anything — she's choosing to do these…

Cooling off just means he didn't kill them in a single incident. Someone who commits a massacre isn't a serial killer. They were separate acts.

Definition is three or more murders, with a cooling off period between each one.

They probably have him under arrest and they've got so long before they need to file the real charges — so probably collecting as much as they can, as carefully as they can before they have to go formal (and public) with what they have.

Is he saying it's intact on land somewhere? Or is he saying that someone is covering up an accident that shouldn't have been allowed to happen and that the plane caught fire and blew up somewhere far, far from where searchers have been directed to look?

It's not like there aren't American drones constantly flying over the two countries, peering into every sheepherder's tent all day, every day. I mean, I'm sure a Boeing 777 can easily be hidden somewhere.

Yes, some people did speculate that completely nonsensical idea.