Making them easier to break is the wrong way of going about it IMO. What’s going to happen is that drivers are going to take less risks. This would be fine in a regular circuit where there’s a lot of space that drivers can use to overtake. In a street course however, there isn’t much space so this runs the risk of…

The thing with the Fiero was, by the time they finally got it right nobody wanted one anymore.  Yet another classic example of a good idea ruined by poor execution.

I bet if they electrified the Camaro, it would shake things up too. Well, that and making it so the driver can see out of the car.

Yeah, I had to double-check that I didn’t click myself into Jezebel or Roots.
What a huge stretch to call Ferrari racists for using a term that 100% has to do with breeding HORSES.

An awful thread of irresponsible mistakes in this article. As already pointed out, the name translates to thoroughbread, and has absolutely no racist connotations.

Or, ya know, it carries non-racial horse racing connotations. Since, ya know, their logo is a horse. And purosangue means thoroughbred.

I can honestly say I would be terrified to drive a hypercar built by Jeep or Land Rover.

“si, si...lol...and then he said...”

I just hope for a similar compromise.

someone presumably younger than me read your comment and has no idea what that hashtag is doing there

A young person liking a Lincoln is the best news Lincoln has heard in 40 years.

I’m not scared of it, nor did I say it had no advantages. I’m not even remotely close to boomer age either. All I said was this shit is gonna break. No matter how much money they throw at engineering the system, it will never be as reliable as a piece of glass.

It is not a truck, SUV or crossover. Therefore, sales will be low.

Honda has stated that this was always meant to be an urban runabout vehicle. Range isn’t nearly as big of an issue in Europe as it is in the US. The range is likely to be around or under 100 in real world conditions. That's a nonstarter for a majority of Americans. No market. 

Range too small is the main thing.

To be fair, that Cosmo is only 52.

Stroll is (on average) within .3 of a second of Perez in qualifying, and given that Perez is pretty universally acknowledged as being pretty quick (not verstappen/hamilton quick, but roughly bottas level) that ain’t bad.

having a rich daddy may be the thing that got him a full time ride in F1, but he had success at…

I’ve tried to watch it. I’ve tried to care. It’s profoundly uninteresting to me. Maybe it’s too slow, maybe it’s because it sounds like vacuum cleaner racing, I don’t know. But I’ve turned on around a dozen Fe races and never made it to the end of a single one...

He can’t qualify for crap, but his race craft isn’t bad. People love to trash him because he is rich, but he’s not nearly as bad as people claim he is. 

Don’t forget GM’s reverse-as-’convenience’ lamps.

I can’t believe there’s not a regulatory requirement that reverse lamps only come on in reverse. Still pisses me off everytime I see it, and doubly so when I think about some moron patting himself on the back for inventing this “feature”