I dunno, I'm seeing "Country Gopher."

Nice try, Vladimir.

But it's a turbo, so that's plus more, right?

Is that real? If so, wow… I can't imagine how Mary Jo Kopechne's parents felt seeing that in National Geographic. The 90s version would be OJ Simpson floating across the Rio Grande I guess.

"Briefly"?

Regarding the question of why the USAF would replicate the flight of the unknown aircraft with known B2s, could it be a real-world experiment to compare the observability of both designs under similar conditions?

That would also explain why there was three of them in relatively close formation. Maybe some brass said…

Yeah, the wings don't worry me that much, but every time I fly — and I'm definitely not a nervous flier — that huge egg of an engine hung out in front of the wing on what looks like a metal straw seems destined to fall off at least once.

Having watched the preview, even if Captain Janeway's Gravitas isn't explicitly arguing that the sun goes around the earth, it still looks like a mash of nonsense. I also liked HNTP on this: http://bit.ly/1mX95UD

How is the MiG-29 dated? Honest question. They were introduced in the 80s and were pretty awesome then. The F-15 is older, and still quite potent. Do you mean these haven't been kept up to date since their original purchase? Do we civilians even know that information?

Totally cosign "bizarre design language." I allllllmost like the 6 "Gran Coupe" (ignoring the name) but those tail lights are an insult to geometry. All BMW tail lights have been horrible for several years.

I am looking really hard at this car to find something I don't like. Maybe the splitter. And the prominence of the fog light fake (real?) scoops. Seriously though, that's all.