What is so unreliable about the Viper? there is almost nothing to break and the engine is essentially a 360 Magnum with 2 cylinders welded on and then recast in aluminum.
What is so unreliable about the Viper? there is almost nothing to break and the engine is essentially a 360 Magnum with 2 cylinders welded on and then recast in aluminum.
You’d have to rengineer the whole drivetrain to make it fit to the point that it wouldn’t be a nsx anymore.
Are you serious.
cool idea but if you are serious about a cheap form of competitive racing , you’d be better off getting a go kart... which these are pretty much based on.
It’s always GM.
That’s a sweet Pontiac Grand Am.
I’d object to that, as there are many “Throwaway” cars that have lasted purely due to enthusiasm. Cars like the Mustang, Camaro and even some high dollar Italian cars were built with absolutely abysmal build quality, but there are prime examples of them still running 40 even 50 years on unrestored. It’s not about how…
Most people don’t drive their Miata’s in the winter though
The difference is Cars don’t become Obsolete in 5 years like most electronic devices.
You say that now but look at cars like the original Toyota Tercel and the Saturn SL1. Very basic cars, but as basic transportation they do there job very well and you still see them kicking around today in reasonably good condition.
Tell that to Jay Leno.
I’d actually expect an S class to last a long, long time regardless of electronics. Part of it is because an S class is built with compromised build quality, and the other part is that S class owners will do whatever it takes to keep it on the road.
the engine is just an NRE crate motor,
This car looks nothing like the gt90.
Actually you would be wrong as the third gen Firebird was one of the most aerodynamic cars GM ever created with a drag coefficient of .29