I’d be curious to hear some of the undisclosed pieces of evidence that makes you think Avery is guilty. I’ve read a number of those articles as well, and while there was some weird / coincidental things that weren’t included in the doc, none of it seemed particularly damning.

If by overwhelming you mean entirely circumstantial, then yes.

Without Brendan’s testimony, as ridiculous as it is, I think Steven would have never been convicted. Brendan gave the police the much needed timeline and narrative that they needed (and all the lurid images for a jury to imagine). He also gave them all the places to plant evidence that would corroborate his story and…

The fact that he purchased manacles three weeks before did seem damning at first, but then you remember how susceptible Brendan is to things he hears and sees and how he could have easily seen them around the house or even been shown them by Steve and included them in part of his story. There is no other evidence…