alex78
Alex
alex78

They do, sometimes, but AC4 was a documented disaster on the PC, and that's with latest patch and the latest NVIDIA drivers. The win+L (or ALT-CTRL-DEL) workaround actually did miracles with the 30fps drops, but it's sad that it had to come to "workarounds" to fix Ubisoft's unwillingness to competently deploy a game

I'd get on my knees for that.

OK, I'm done for the day. First time ever that I've been on this site, and I just spent the better of two hours reading nearly every story up to this point. What is wrong down there with your my dear American cousins? Seriously? The land of the free?! I mean up here in Canada we don't have a spotless track record

Sounds like Assassin's Creed vs AC2. The sequel was superior in every way. I replayed 1 just for kicks sometime after Brotherhood, and yes, I had the distinct impression that 1 was especially like a proof of concept release. Polished, and finished, but definitely an experiment of sorts. I'm certain WD2 will

Haha, damn it I want to eat my own words and spit on my own dick hard attitude sometimes. After seeing the new trailer, I want to pre-order that game. Never a rule without an exception I guess!

I completely see the value in supporting devs/teams through kickstarter efforts, but that's why I called it a different animal relative to, and I'm just throwing this out there, Ubisoft raking in pre-order cash. Let's forego the basics since we both get that, but suffice to say it's very different in essence and in

But your points enforce the anti-preorder attitude that has taken hold in gamers (I can't quantify that but I'll assume that many of those people who promise never to preorder a game actually stick with it). You say that buying a final product isn't much of a guarantee, but if that's the case (and it is) then by

I certainly don't have the same experiences as you, but I do love playing good games, and the filth that has been dumped on those of us who believed in preordering games, even from very reputable teams, has clearly demonstrated that pre-release financial support on the parts of consumers doesn't equate to the quality

No! I have been on a verbal rampage lately asking gamers to stop pre-ordering games! Why must you and your sort have the need to pre-order? Are you worried that it will sell out and never ever to be found again for purchase? Really... Pre-ordering games has caused developers/publishers to focus on PR and

I honestly want to know if there are any articles about this issue. I mean, if someone is actually taking the initiative to build a new computer, why would they opt to not but an SSD? I need to know or else I'm going on a hunger strike!

Are there still people who build new systems with conventional hard drives as their system drives? I mean that just makes no sense to me. I have been building my (and friends') computers for nearly a decade now, and truth be told I have never seen a more worthy upgrade than moving from HDD to SSD for the system

It was a while back when I actually decided to never, ever pre-order a game moving forward, around that time I also decided never to jump on any sort of hype bandwagons. Since then, I've been grateful for this mature, intelligent disposition and in times like these, I feel thoroughly vindicated. I wish people would

One thing that strikes me odd, time and time again, is the fact that people STILL fall for pre-orders! In fact, this little seemingly benign phenomenon of people pre-ordering games is probably a big reason for crappy games. Who cares what we think the day the game is released, or the negative feedback, the truth is

What's the saying? 85% of statistics are 75% wrong? Something like that...but seriously, 90% dead? Sushi isn't a rich man's food, I mean it's not difficult at all to find decent sushi for the same same price as a McDonald's meal (upsized, of course), and I'm certain that factory farming to sustain that industry is

Yeah, but the Prince of Persia games ran well, even at launch. So did Splinter Cell games, until the last one. But the sheer unoptimized Ubi games these days is sad. I mean one would assume that by a certain point of patching & driver updates, a game would play well so long as the hardware can run it, but honestly

If memory serves me correctly though, it was Ubisoft that was touting the graphical prowess of this game though, I mean they were the ones who set the standard that we simply expected them to stick to. Not disagreeing with you by any means, but let's not pretend like Ubisoft wasn't going on and on and on about how

I have an i5 3570k at 4.4Ghz, 16GB RAM, GTX770 4GB at 1265Mhz and I still can't play Assassin's Creed 4 at max settings after 4 updates and now, what, on the 3rd or so driver sets? I mean if god rays are at high, there's a perceptible amount of FPS drop - god rays! Shadows can't exceed medium. Anything over FXAA

Thanks for sharing that! It was a very time worthy read and it certainly moved my knowledge of the issue up a few notches. I should like to say one thing though, and I am not about to contradict anything I read in there (I simply don't care enough to put the effort into referencing all the claims she made), but the

No, no - I have South Korean friends (sorry if that sounds contrived) why would you assume that I have any disrespect for the country or her people, I just find the whole plastic surgery issue sad, that's all. If the circumstances would be the same here in Canada, I'd have the same issue with it, and would have

Umm, no, Korea is sort of defined today as a territory, comprised of two countries, entirely independent of one another. To call it "Korea" and automatically imply South Korea is wrong and self-righteous. If you want to refer to South Korea you have to state it, or at least not argue it when it does get brought up.