Given that they were Syrian Democratic Forces, yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Democratic_Forces

If this is a joke, um... funny?

Uhmmm... generally you don’t get a Plea Bargain before you enter a plea. Like... a plea of not guilty is at arraignment, which is the first step in the whole process. It can be a year, and sometimes even more before you actually face trial.

Nah. Hayao Miyazaki’s movies have way less naked cartwheels and nanomachines.

Browns have a win. Think the 2008 Lions still lose.

Wait, you know there is a football team in Detroit right? I mean the Browns are bad. But no one, but no one, will ever be worse than the 2008 Detroit Lions.

Pachinko has the same target audience as gambling, because Pachinko is gambling. Young Men (because men make more than women, especially in Japan, and young people have more disposable income because they don’t have kids). This is the same audience for video games, for the most part.

The issue with this perspective is that the F-35, F-15, and F-18 are all fundamentally worse at the A-10's job then the A-10. The truth is, they were never designed to do CAS. CAS has very different specifications than most missions, and the vast majority of aircraft designed by the USAF do it poorly. They don’t like…

Visa and entry are one and the same. A visa is the right to enter the country. That is all it is. To claim that one can bar entry without affecting the granting of Visas is a pretty silly proposition. Also, the Department of State disagrees with you, as under Trump’s executive order, they have begun cancelling Visas.

I am. The act states what it states. Also, the quotas have explicit exceptions they are not allowed to affect, which Trump’s order does not include. Even if he is using his quota setting authority, rather than the broad emergency authority (which he isn’t because the quota setting authority lacks the power to strip…

Fine, here is a citation: 8 USC 1152(a)(1)(A:)

Actually, if you are talking about IANA, no, no it doesn’t. It actually contains an express provision barring individuals from being ‘discriminated against’ based upon ‘national origin.’ So to bar people based on national origin... yeah. Thats forbidden by the law.

Oh no, I absolutely do, as I’ve said here. The police should respond to this kind of 911 call, but a single car should have probably shown up, and when it became clear that no crime had been committed, and no one was in distress, they should have left. This was a disgrace.

S0 am I. Pretext doesn’t mean Probable Cause doesn’t exist. A stop suppressed based on Pretext was done with probable cause to stop/arrest, but for an impermissible reason. The fact that you don’t know this makes me think you might be a shitty lawyer and prosecutor. Or be lying. Also, if you couldn’t beat a motion to…

Actually, Michelle Obama has a better than fair chance of winning. She’s very, very popular.

Because Meth is a hell of a drug.

I’m going to be 100% honest with you. Black People can commit crimes. Just like white people, and every other race. When the cops hear a call, they should respond. 

“Miiiiichelle Obaaaaammma.”

I’ll admit it, I’m heartbroken. The first Presidential Election I was eligible for, I was proud to cast my vote for Barack Obama. In the second one, I was even prouder to (I proudly casted my vote for Hillary Clinton this time, who carried my state by 20%, but we all know how that went.) He did a fantastic job, and…

Actually... attempted theft of a tape measure is a crime. So yes. Yes they did. When the Construction Worker said “He tried to walk off with my tape measure” they had probable cause to put him under arrest.